View Single Post
  #5  
Old 10-22-2013, 08:23 PM
duxthe1 duxthe1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,354
I went that route before my MS install, with less than stellar results. I ended up having to use an MSD BTM (Boost Timing Master) with the EZL in its most retarded setting and this was when I ran 9 PSI. It worked but I didn't really like it, not to mention you'd need 2 BTMs with the 119's dual coil setup. Comparatively I'd rate the EZL+BTM a 2, and the MS ignition control a 99.

With an MS3 you could do a coil on plug setup using factory late 119 valve covers and coils, but honestly I've never considered that setup terribly robust. It would be pretty novel to have the sequential ignition but if it were mine I'd just have the MS control the stock 2Xcoil 2Xcap ignition setup. If you did go COP, it would be nice to swap the late exhaust cams and upper timing covers while you're at it, just to get rid of the cam seal in the covers not to mention gain a little extra room in what is likely to be a cramped engine bay once boost is made and routed.
__________________

90 300TE 4-M
Turbo 103, T3/T04E 50 trim
T04B cover .60 AR
Stage 3 turbine .63 AR
A2W I/C, 40 LB/HR
MS2E, 60-2 Direct Coil Control
3" Exh, AEM W/B O2
Underdrive Alt. and P/S Pulleys,
Vented Rear Discs, .034 Booster.
3.07 diffs 1st Gear Start

90 300CE
104.980
Milled & ported head, 10.3:1 compression
197° intake cam w/20° advancer
Tuned CIS ECU
4° ignition advance
PCS TCM2000, built 722.6
600W networked suction fan
Sportline sway bars
V8 rear subframe, Quaife ATB 3.06 diff
Reply With Quote