11-04-2013, 05:21 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,061
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by barry12345
Judge awarded a Canadian bell satalite client 270k today for privacy invasion. They lifted his signature on an installation order and used it for a signature on a permission form so they could do a credit check. I guess in Canada you have to give anyone written permission to do a credit check.. I was unaware of that..
The judge stated with all the details of the case unless he made it punative bell would not pay attention to their illegal practices. Would not surprise me if the judge had been a client of their services before.
I know from personal experience they are unbelievable and wondered just how many cave in to their fraudulent ways.
|
It used to be like that in the States but from what I understand it has changed so that any tom, dick or harry can pull your credit pretty much for any reason. The end of any privacy or the right to your own financial information.
|