Quote:
Originally Posted by SwampYankee
I don't think mastery needs to be the minimum threshold before taking on another language, a good working knowledge might be. I wouldn't say that I've mastered the English language (I know, the hell you say!  ). I do think I'm sufficiently proficient  to move onto another one, though.
Besides it's a lot easier for young skulls to absorb. |
I'm not sure what you consider mastery. I don't think you need to be able to use huge long words to be considered master of the domain. You however need to be able to express yourself well enough to say get a job. OTOH, if you can only say "Ah needs to ax you wha choo wants to.....", I wouldn't consider it mastery or sufficiently proficient. If you can't use simple contractions like "you're" and say "your" instead, well.......
It might be easier for young people to absorb but again, "can" is meaningless if you lack the attitude. If you cannot speak your native tongue, how will I expect you to master your grammar and spelling for a 2nd language? In theory, it is easier to master when you are young. However, if your attitude sucks, easier doesn't mean squat. It is easier to lose weight when you are young but if you insist on eating twinkies all day long, it will be easier to lose weight when you are 50 if you have the right attitude. With the wrong attitude, it might be easier in theory but it is a waste of time and resources. As I say, if you can't even master the 3 Rs, why do I want to toss more time and effort and money into you? Show me you can first then I spend the money