View Single Post
  #6  
Old 10-17-2014, 08:06 PM
LUVMBDiesels's Avatar
LUVMBDiesels LUVMBDiesels is offline
Dead on balls accurate...
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Red Lion,Pa
Posts: 2,207
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimFreeh View Post
Please explain.
Did you ever own one?


Our experience with several late (65-69) that were daily drivers from the early seventies thru the mid eighties gave me a genuine appreciation for these maligned cars. Not only very pretty, but dead reliable, and when properly equipped (turbo or 4 carb engine and 4 speed manual), a lot of fun to drive.

Most hits against the Corvair are old repeated untruths, or based upon very poorly maintained examples.

I can think of a number of other cars that hit closer to the Yugo than the Corvair.

Jim
Mine was a 1963 Monza 900 convertible and I loved it. It handled very well out of the gate and even better at 70+ when it seemed to suck down to the road.
The engine was reliable, well except for that damn fan belt, but I just carried a couple spares in the front trunk. It was stylish, got great MPG, and turned heads wherever I took her.

I wish I still had it.
__________________
"I have no convictions ... I blow with the wind, and the prevailing wind happens to be from Vichy"

Current
Monika '74 450 SL
BrownHilda '79 280SL
FoxyCleopatra '99 Chevy Suburban
Scarlett 2014 Jeep Cherokee
Krystal 2004 Volvo S60
Gone
'74 Jeep CJ5
'97 Jeep ZJ Laredo
Rudolf ‘86 300SDL
Bruno '81 300SD
Fritzi '84 BMW
'92 Subaru
'96 Impala SS
'71 Buick GS conv
'67 GTO conv
'63 Corvair conv
'57 Nomad
Reply With Quote