View Single Post
  #6  
Old 06-20-2017, 05:45 PM
shertex shertex is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Barrington, RI
Posts: 5,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Reiner View Post
In the rest of the world, consumption is expressed as:
Litres per 100 kilometers>L/100km
It is the reciprocal of distance per litre, or miles per gallon.

Hence, entering a positive correction factor will result in a displayed reduction of miles/gallon (1/miles/gallon=gallons/mile, which is the form of the correction).
That makes sense....so looks like I got it backwards.
__________________
14 E250 Bluetec 4Matic "Sinclair", Palladium Silver on Black, 159k miles
06 E320 CDI "Rutherford", Black on Tan, 179k mi, Stage 1 tune, tuned TCU
91 300D "Otis", Smoke Silver on Tan, 145k mi, wastegate conversion, ALDA delete

19 Honda CR-V EX 77k mi
Fourteen other MB's owned and sold
1961 Very Tolerant Wife
Reply With Quote