View Single Post
  #12  
Old 07-05-2018, 04:45 PM
JHZR2's Avatar
JHZR2 JHZR2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,455
Quote:
Originally Posted by Squiggle Dog View Post
In my opinion, the W116 is better-looking and seems to be higher quality. It is, of course, the S-Class to the E-Class W123. It's also a lot nimbler, has a much sharper turning radius, and is easier to drive than a W126--which feels like driving a big boat that's dragging its anchor, and is hard to park. I've never driven a car with a nicer ride than a W116.

A W116 is built more like a Rolls-Royce when compared to a W123, but it makes sense because the W123 was meant to be a more economy-minded vehicle. The W126 has too much plastic for my liking, and then anything newer than that, might as well just buy a new car.

Thanks. Makes a lot of sense. Agree that the 123 doesn't compare to a 116; rather, that comparison would be a 115.

I don't have firsthand driving experience of the 116 vs 126 - inteeeting info!
__________________
Current Diesels:
1981 240D (73K)
1982 300CD (169k)
1985 190D (169k)
1991 350SD (116k)
1991 350SD (206k)
1991 300D (228k)
2008 ML320 CDI (199k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (442k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (267k)

Past Diesels:
1983 300D (228K), 1985 300D (233K), 1993 300D 2.5T (338k), 1993 300SD (291k)
Reply With Quote