View Single Post
  #3  
Old 11-10-2004, 10:53 PM
deanyel deanyel is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,726
Not much different than a 3.2. My recollection is that in 1993, when there was a 300E 3.2 and 300E 2.8, the EPA rating on the 2.8 was 1 mpg better than the 3.2 - I believe it was 20/26 versus 19/25. Euro rear axle ratios may well have been different.
Reply With Quote