if it is impossible to know why should one theory hold sway over another? that is the same narrow-minded behavior that the church tried in order to silence scientific inquiry in the middle ages. it was an ill-conceived strategy then and still is. secular society is now playing the role of inquistor simply because enlightenment rationalism still carries the day in academia. if intelligent design is so stupid, irrational, implausible etc. why not teach it in order to demonstrate the distinction between a well-grounded theory and one that isn't? (irealize you never referred to it as 'stupid' or irrational' i am just making a point)

__________________
0o==o0

James 4:8

"...let us put aside the blindness of mind of those who can conceive of nothing higher than what is known through the senses"
-Saint Gregory Palamas, ---Discourse on the Holy Transfiguration of Our Lord God and Savior Jesus Christ


Centrally located in North East Central Pa.