Matt Drudge has been proven time and time again as an internet sensationalist with no more credability than the National Enquirer. Like them, even he gets a story right every now and then, but fact checking has not been his strong point. I expect a Dan Rather comment inserted here. Although not a big fan, he did get more things right than wrong, which is not something one could substantiate about our fat little internet friend Matt. Now I can understand why one might enjoy reading Drudge; he's entertaining. But that's what it is, entertainment. He is no more a credible news source than Mother Jones (which I find quite entertaining).