![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Buffer Pad Size Choices
I have a Porter Cable RO polisher and it came with the 6" pad and I have the 6" hook & loop arbor attachment. I notice that some folks are using the polisher with smaller 5" pads and was wondering what, if any, advantage the slightly smaller pad provides. I understand that the balancer has to be changed, and it turns out I already have the 5" balancer in my kit, so it's just a matter of a new hook & loop and some pads. Any clear advantage?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I like the smaller pads because you have more control, i.e. less surface area for when you are maneuvering around molding, trim, edges, side view mirrors, etc.
__________________
Paul S. 2001 E430, Bourdeaux Red, Oyster interior. 79,200 miles. 1973 280SE 4.5, 170,000 miles. 568 Signal Red, Black MB Tex. "The Red Baron". |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Pad size means more if you are using a rotary than for a RO. Larger pads turn at a higher RPM (at the out edge) than smaller pads. (Thank you, Mr. Wizard
![]() For compounding and initial polishing a rotary buffer does a better and faster job. It takes experience to use one without buffing through the paint especially the clear coat. Practice before you attempt to use one on your car. For light compounding, small scratch removal, polishing and waxing the RO works fine. I use an 11" one for all the large flat areas and then go back with my 5" for getting close to the trim and nooks and crannies. Using a smaller pad means you need to pay a lot more attention to your "overlap". It's easy to end up with lines in your polish. Get a cushioned pad where the bonnets slip over the pad rather than a "hook and loop". Use a microfiber bonnet for the final polishing stage. Check out the "buffandshine.com" website. Last edited by Mike D; 03-04-2009 at 07:09 AM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Why do you like the bonnets better than the hook-n-loop pads?
__________________
" We have nothing to fear but the main stream media itself . . . ."- Adapted from Franklin D Roosevelt for the 21st century ![]() OBK #55 1998 Lincoln Continental - Sold Max 1984 300TD 285,000 miles - Sold The Dee8gonator 1987 560SEC 196,000 miles - Sold Orgasmatron - 2006 CLS500 90,000 miles 2002 C320 Wagon 122,000 miles 2016 AMG GTS 12,000 miles |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
They're easier to clean and the cushioned pad allows you to get a lot closer to trim areas by allowing you to use the "edge" of the pad.
You can also slip the bonnet off the buffer and use the bonnet for those final touch-ups around the really tight places. I use the "hook and loop" on my rotary for ease of pad changing. Just lazy I guess. Last edited by Mike D; 03-10-2009 at 10:57 AM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
I like the hook-n-loop for sanding. I don't have a buffer . . . yet. I might after my next birthday, though. Doesn't the PC come with a hook-n-loop pad?
__________________
" We have nothing to fear but the main stream media itself . . . ."- Adapted from Franklin D Roosevelt for the 21st century ![]() OBK #55 1998 Lincoln Continental - Sold Max 1984 300TD 285,000 miles - Sold The Dee8gonator 1987 560SEC 196,000 miles - Sold Orgasmatron - 2006 CLS500 90,000 miles 2002 C320 Wagon 122,000 miles 2016 AMG GTS 12,000 miles |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Mine didn't. I think it only came with a sponge polisher.
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|