Quote:
Originally Posted by sixto
A big thanks to M.B.DOC for the protrusion check instructions (in the Tech forum).
I don't have a dial gauge but I have the 603.971 beside a 603.961 and the protrusion of the 603.961 leaves no doubt. Consequently it's clear that the #1 rod of the 603.971 is bent forward.
Now to see if fitting a 603.961 block in a W140 is as straightforward as we figure.
Dang! That's some sweet torque I'll be giving up 
Thanks,
Sixto
93 300SD |
How about measuring that cyl for out of round and taper. Maybe you can replace rods and save that block? Just a suggestion but then you would not have to loose that torque and mess with fitting another engine.
10-13-2006, 12:52 PM
Threaded Mode
