![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Exhaust gas velocity
Would lengthening the distance from the manifold to the turbocharger (or equal length custom headers help increase the vlocity of the exhaust gasses before they reach the impeller?
__________________
RIP: 80 300SD RIP: 79 450SEL 2002 E430 4matic (212,000km) 2002 ML500 'sport' ![]() ____________________________ FACEBOOK: PANZER450 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
It would slow it down.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Given equal discharges from the engine and equal turbochargers, the velocity is directly related to the heat of the exhaust. More distance means more heat loss and lower velocity. Also lower exhaust energy at the turbine, which is no coincidence.
To increase the exhaust energy, insulate your manifold to keep the heat from escaping. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Thats a good way to crack the manifold too.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Yes it is. I was about to add the text, "If the manifold can take it," but didn't.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Now, I could possibly see some benefit in a creatively designed venturi type setup, use an oversized pipe off the engine and reduce it to normal size just entering the turbo, gas flows faster thru the smaller opening to maintain equal flow. Starting with an oversize pipe to a normal size also prevents creating excessive restriction.
__________________
Chris 64 190D R.I.P. ![]() 80 240D W/617 engine -for sale 82 240D -for sale |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
The only venturi shape that does any good is that which is in the turbine. Putting a small but fast stream into the turbine will not help.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
But your vanes will open under high-volume use, which is what you want. Restricting the exhaust under all conditions can't really be good, can it? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
No, it will cause high exhaust pressure which will reduce engine power from higher pumping losses.
There is one good way to increase the velocity on the T3. Change the turbine housing from the stock 0.48 A/R to a 0.36 A/R housing used on some VW 1.6L diesels. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
I just thought that by allowing the exhaust gasses to move further before they hit the impeller would allow the gases also to gain momentum by having another ignition cycle pushing it along...I'm not an engineer
![]() and there would be no restrictions so gasses wouldn't really build up much
__________________
RIP: 80 300SD RIP: 79 450SEL 2002 E430 4matic (212,000km) 2002 ML500 'sport' ![]() ____________________________ FACEBOOK: PANZER450 |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? As long as they would add one additional commandment for you to keep thy religion to thyself. George Carlin (Wonder where he is now..) 1981 240d (engine donor 1983 240d) recently rebuilt engine hurray! - No more.. fought a tree and the tree won. pearl black 1983 240d 4speed (Converted!@$$%) atleast the tranny was rebuilt. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Probably the best way to maintain exhaust velocity would be to attach 5 tiny turbos directly to the exhaust port.
![]() ![]() |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
not taking into account the cost of actually doing it. Also that would be the most wicked noise ![]()
__________________
RIP: 80 300SD RIP: 79 450SEL 2002 E430 4matic (212,000km) 2002 ML500 'sport' ![]() ____________________________ FACEBOOK: PANZER450 |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Or six of them, in my case. That's a tiny unit. I like it.
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|