Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-22-2007, 10:23 PM
PanzerSD's Avatar
Schießenstern
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Saskatchewan Canada
Posts: 2,351
Exhaust gas velocity

Would lengthening the distance from the manifold to the turbocharger (or equal length custom headers help increase the vlocity of the exhaust gasses before they reach the impeller?
__________________
RIP: 80 300SD
RIP: 79 450SEL
2002 E430 4matic (212,000km)
2002 ML500 'sport'

____________________________
FACEBOOK:
PANZER450
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-22-2007, 10:36 PM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It would slow it down.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-22-2007, 10:42 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,263
Given equal discharges from the engine and equal turbochargers, the velocity is directly related to the heat of the exhaust. More distance means more heat loss and lower velocity. Also lower exhaust energy at the turbine, which is no coincidence.

To increase the exhaust energy, insulate your manifold to keep the heat from escaping.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-22-2007, 10:46 PM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt L View Post
To increase the exhaust energy, insulate your manifold to keep the heat from escaping.
Thats a good way to crack the manifold too.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-22-2007, 11:03 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForcedInduction View Post
Thats a good way to crack the manifold too.
Yes it is. I was about to add the text, "If the manifold can take it," but didn't.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-22-2007, 11:17 PM
Mustang_man298's Avatar
Man of the fire
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Shingletown,Ca
Posts: 941
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt L View Post
Given equal discharges from the engine and equal turbochargers, the velocity is directly related to the heat of the exhaust. More distance means more heat loss and lower velocity. Also lower exhaust energy at the turbine, which is no coincidence.

To increase the exhaust energy, insulate your manifold to keep the heat from escaping.
I do agree with the cooling causing a loss, also, a longer pipe creates more backpressure in the system, which hinders power. I don't know about heat wrapping a pipe going into a turbo, those bearings are sensitive as it is to heat being the harsh environment they are already in.
Now, I could possibly see some benefit in a creatively designed venturi type setup, use an oversized pipe off the engine and reduce it to normal size just entering the turbo, gas flows faster thru the smaller opening to maintain equal flow. Starting with an oversize pipe to a normal size also prevents creating excessive restriction.
__________________
Chris
64 190D R.I.P.
80 240D W/617 engine -for sale
82 240D -for sale
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-22-2007, 11:35 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,263
The only venturi shape that does any good is that which is in the turbine. Putting a small but fast stream into the turbine will not help.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-22-2007, 11:40 PM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt L View Post
The only venturi shape that does any good is that which is in the turbine. Putting a small but fast stream into the turbine will not help.
Are you sure? That's what happens every time my turbo's vanes are closed, low volume but high velocity.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-23-2007, 12:06 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForcedInduction View Post
Are you sure? That's what happens every time my turbo's vanes are closed, low volume but high velocity.
That's a good point. I'm a lot less sure now.

But your vanes will open under high-volume use, which is what you want. Restricting the exhaust under all conditions can't really be good, can it?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-23-2007, 12:12 AM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
No, it will cause high exhaust pressure which will reduce engine power from higher pumping losses.

There is one good way to increase the velocity on the T3. Change the turbine housing from the stock 0.48 A/R to a 0.36 A/R housing used on some VW 1.6L diesels.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-23-2007, 01:02 AM
PanzerSD's Avatar
Schießenstern
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Saskatchewan Canada
Posts: 2,351
I just thought that by allowing the exhaust gasses to move further before they hit the impeller would allow the gases also to gain momentum by having another ignition cycle pushing it along...I'm not an engineer

and there would be no restrictions so gasses wouldn't really build up much
__________________
RIP: 80 300SD
RIP: 79 450SEL
2002 E430 4matic (212,000km)
2002 ML500 'sport'

____________________________
FACEBOOK:
PANZER450
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-23-2007, 01:20 AM
Cervan's Avatar
Crazy mechanic.
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: olympia washington
Posts: 1,809
Quote:
Originally Posted by PanzerSD View Post
I just thought that by allowing the exhaust gasses to move further before they hit the impeller would allow the gases also to gain momentum by having another ignition cycle pushing it along...I'm not an engineer

and there would be no restrictions so gasses wouldn't really build up much
you could compound turbos and solve the turbo spool up time problem.
__________________
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac?

As long as they would add one additional commandment for you to keep thy religion to thyself.
George Carlin (Wonder where he is now..)

1981 240d (engine donor 1983 240d) recently rebuilt engine hurray! - No more.. fought a tree and the tree won.

pearl black 1983 240d 4speed (Converted!@$$%) atleast the tranny was rebuilt.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-23-2007, 01:25 AM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Probably the best way to maintain exhaust velocity would be to attach 5 tiny turbos directly to the exhaust port.

Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-23-2007, 02:03 AM
PanzerSD's Avatar
Schießenstern
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Saskatchewan Canada
Posts: 2,351
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForcedInduction View Post
Probably the best way to maintain exhaust velocity would be to attach 5 tiny turbos directly to the exhaust port.

If one were to actually DO that would the benefit be power or efficiency?
not taking into account the cost of actually doing it.
Also that would be the most wicked noise 5 turbos spooling up!
__________________
RIP: 80 300SD
RIP: 79 450SEL
2002 E430 4matic (212,000km)
2002 ML500 'sport'

____________________________
FACEBOOK:
PANZER450
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-23-2007, 01:55 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,263
Or six of them, in my case. That's a tiny unit. I like it.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page