![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is Kelly blue book value meaningless???
When it comes to the diesel MB's, is the blue book value really anything to go by? They always seem to go for much more than what any bluebook values show. I see some cars I am interested in, then I see them priced 3 and 4 grand more than the book value, and i have to wonder which is more accurate. I know demand plays a part, but I thought kellys considered this?
__________________
1996 E300 D 1992 300D 1990 Ford E-350 7.3 Diesel AKA "the Deep Fryer" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I did not consult the Kelly Blue Book when I bought my car. I watched the auctions on EBay, and kept a log on what cars were selling for, the condition, mileage, etc. I don't think the KBB looks at EBay or Craig's list but I could be wrong. I think they are more accurate for late model cars that are sold throught dealers and reported by dealers.
Richard
__________________
85 300D 75K Anthracite Grey 0-60 in 13 seconds **For Sale** 84 300D 333K Black (The Velveteen Rabbit) 0-60 in 14 seconds 00 Toyota Sienna 208K (Sold) 15 Subaru Outback 43K 11 Subaru Outback 67K 98 Ford Taurus 100K (Gertie - Was Grandma's - drove it to church and shopping - really) Daughter's car now. 30 Model A Ford 2 Door Sedan (Sold) 0-60 in . . . Never reached 60 ![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I think that KBB and Edmunds are based on the sale prices reported by dealers to state tag agencies. The state agencies collect sales tax, and the dealers rarely lie about this, because it is not their money and if they reported a lower price to cut the buyer a deal, they could be busted. A lot of dealer sales are financed, and the figures have to be accurate for the loan papers and such.
On the other hand, if two individuals make a deal, there is little likelihood that the buyer is trying to pull a sting operation on the seller, and the price reported is likely to be on the low side. The older the car and the more likely it is a cash sale, the less accurate the KBB and Edmund prices are likely to be, or at least so it seems to me. I'd say for an older Benz, E-Bay is perhaps a better index than KBB or Edmunds.
__________________
Semibodacious Transmogrifications a Specialty 1990 300D 2.5 Turbo sedan 171K (Rudolf) 1985 300D Turbo TD Wagon 219K (Remuda) "Time flies like and arrow, yet fruit flies like a banana" ---Marx (Groucho) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I think I agree with you 100%. Not that I would do it or anything, but I have HEARD of people putitng a lower sale price on the title when sold 3rd party. ebay tends to be fairly consistant too on sale prices, so it seems to be more of an accurate predictor.
__________________
1996 E300 D 1992 300D 1990 Ford E-350 7.3 Diesel AKA "the Deep Fryer" |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
You are characterizing the impact to pricing from irrational exuberance of relatively inexperienced and/or less sophisticated players in a narrow market. They are especially influenced with all the hype and sensationalized hoopla about waste oil conversion ideology and the empty dream of "free" fuel.
I practice healthy skepticism of the ebay values since there is really no way of knowing whether or not the bidders are shills driving up the price and if the exchange is ever actually, or legitimately consumated. I observe about 15-18 percent of the listings are no-sale and reposted, and that further skews the statistical average. So in answer to your question, I agree that Ebay "bids" are considerably out of line with the KBB values and the whole of the market appraisals... especially for pre-1990 and certain desireable models.
__________________
Bama1 ![]() 2008 SLK 280, Firemist Red - "Hurricane" 2001 F150 Lariat 4x4, Black on Black - "Badboy" 1982 240D 4 speed survivor -"Pearl" - Donated to Vietnam Veterans 1962 Oldsmobile Dynamic 88 -"Gertrude" 1954 model original owner - ~2.5M Gray softtop/solid exterior/modified chassis ![]() ![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I dunno, I didnt think of that, and you are right as well, LOTS of auctions are listed a week or 2 after a high sell. Claims of "dead beat bidders" all over the auction. I really wonder how many people jack the prices of their auctions. We all know it happens, just how often.
__________________
1996 E300 D 1992 300D 1990 Ford E-350 7.3 Diesel AKA "the Deep Fryer" |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Edmunds and KBB make no sense for old cars. Just for grins, go look at what a mint condition 90,000 mile 1981 Datsun 280Z turbo with leather seats lists for.
Would you sell yours for that amount? Would you pay that amount for a good parts car?
__________________
1983 300SD "Guderian" 1987 MR2 2015 Camry 2015 Chevy Spark 2006 Hyundai Tucson |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Nada.com Is Fairly Accurate. Try That. Some Insurance Company Use It When Paying For A Totaled Car.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I'd only pay what its worth to me. If they don't want to sell it for that much then there are plenty of others to choose from.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Purported price ranges skew things and condition objectiveness comes into play. Cars that have a book price range of $4000 to $12000 will have a price tag of $10,000. Huh?
![]() |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Agreed! I think a 300td is listed any where from a few thousand to more than $10,000, depending on shape/condition, etc. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
I just bought my 240D and negotiated the price based on range between the asking price for a similar (but less well-maintained) 240D on craigslist in Dallas and the NADA retail value. KBB doesn't even go back far enough for my 1980.
No problems and both the PO and I were happy with the final price. On the other hand, I have an older Nissan P/U I am trying to sell (very desirable in my city - wanna buy it? ![]() My point is that KBB WAY undervalues older cars, and doesn't consider regional variations in demand. The mileage cutoff is just plain annoying. edmunds isn't much better, either.
__________________
![]() Current Mercedes 1979 maple yellow 240D 4-speed Gone and fondly remembered: 1980 orient red 240D 4-speed Gone and NOT fondly remembered: 1982 Chna Blue 300TD Other car in the stable: 2013 VW Jetta Sportwagen TDI / 6-speed MT |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The 1985 and later models seem to go for more than my '83, probably because a lot of them in this area are being bought to run bioD or {WS}VO. 1985 is probably the magic year because that's the model that was used in some well-referenced (dare I say, groundbreaking?) alternative fuels article. If I hadn't paid a slight premium wen I did, I'd probably still be looking or have settled for something in worse condition.
__________________
'83 300DTurbo http://badges.fuelly.com/images/smallsig-us/318559.png Broadband: more lies faster. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
plenty?
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|