|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Cruise Control: Can Bulbs REALLY Affect Function??
In my reading on potential causes of cruise control failure, I've seen some scattered references to the importance of using ONLY OEM bulbs (Bosch or Osram) in the brake lamps. Allegedly, using the wrong bulb affects the grounding of the circuit and can/will cause the cruise control to malfunction.
Is this true? I have some off-brand bulbs in my brake lights, so I thought I'd at least ask. In my case, however, the bulbs have been in there for several years while the cruise control problems are of recent vintage. Thanks.
__________________
14 E250 Bluetec 4Matic "Sinclair", Palladium Silver on Black, 154k miles 06 E320 CDI "Rutherford", Black on Tan, 172k mi, Stage 1 tune, tuned TCU 91 300D "Otis", Smoke Silver on Tan, 142k mi, wastegate conversion, ALDA delete 19 Honda CR-V EX 61k mi Fourteen other MB's owned and sold 1961 Very Tolerant Wife |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Can Bulbs REALLY Affect Function?
Completely untrue.
The wrong bulb CAN melt the taillight but it has no effect on the cruise control except that a burned out bulb will keep the cruise from working. What it does is bias a transistor. When the light is on it sees 12 volts, when its off it sees a low impedance resistive ground. If its a burned out bulb and sees an open and doesn't work at all. The type and wattage of the bulb makes no difference of any kind to the cruise control. EDIT: Several members have the 4 brake light mod (doubling the wattage) with working cruise control. Last edited by ForcedInduction; 01-13-2008 at 09:11 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I agree!
__________________
I got too many cars!! Insurance eats me alive. Dave 78 Corvette Stingray - 3k 82 242 Turbo Volvo - Manual - 270k 86 300e 5 speed manual - 210k 87 420sel - 240k 89 560sl - 78k 91 420sel - 205k 91 560sel - 85k 94 GMC Suburban - 90k 97 Harley Davidson Heritage Softail - 25k 00 GMC Silverado 1 ton 30k |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I'm one of those guys. Cruise works great.
__________________
79 MB 280 SEL Euro 133k 77 MB 450SL 154k 05 Mustang GT Vert (3) 104k 12 TSX Wagon Tech (66k) (192k) 06 Subaru Outback base (135k) 164k 16 Acura MDX (109k) 111k 18 Silverado 2500 LTZ Midnight (212) 56k 97 Ford Ranger 163k 11 RAV4 154k 01 Escape 173k 04 Honda Pilot 292k 1967 Mustang (Resto Project) 1968 Mustang (Parts Bin) 00 Ford Ranger 124k |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
My cruise doesn't work, but its due to a flaky cruise amp.
__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life- '15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800) '17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k) '09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k) '13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k) '01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km) '16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
bulbs
__________________
~shell As of 2/2010: 2001 CLK55 0o\=*=/o0 13.6 @ 106mph 10K mi 1984 300SD 260K mi and going and going... 97 S600 46K miles 1991 Sentra SE-R (extremely dorked with) www.se-r.net |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Bookmarked that site, I had forgotten what it was called. Thanks.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
There's a flaw in logic when folks say "I have added bulbs and it works fine..." or something of the sort. Adding bulbs isn't relevant, but "subtracting" bulbs (as the cruise drain senses it) is a problem. If a bulb burns out or there is sufficient resistance due to corrosion (which can happen with cheapo bulbs), the drain will see a high condition and think the brake lights are on, thus preventing the cruise from engaging.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
That was always known and stated many times.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Well, many folks apparently don't understand that, given the posts above that say the cruise works fine with more bulbs. The addition of bulbs isn't relevant to the original post and confuses the issue.
Last edited by Shawn D.; 01-18-2008 at 06:40 PM. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I do not understand, could you explain?? With the brake light switch open, there is nothing to see.Corrosion or not , it is not in the circuit. Thanks in advance for your reply. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Not trying to be nasty, so don't take it like that. Last edited by ImBroke; 01-19-2008 at 12:16 PM. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I had not looked at a wire diagram (lazy me) Your explaination was clear and simple. Thanks again |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Bookmarks |
|
|