Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 05-01-2008, 12:19 PM
I'm thinkin, I'm thinkin.
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, Texas
Posts: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by bgkast View Post
I'll stick to Mobil, I like REAL synthetic oils
Rotella synthetic 5W40 is $16.88 a gallon at Wally Mart...

http://www.imakenews.com/rotella/e_article000373489.cfm?x=b11,0,w

__________________
Sharing my partner's 2012 Forte 5dr SX til I find my next 123 or 126..
-
Do I miss being a service advisor ???
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-01-2008, 12:29 PM
gsxr's Avatar
Unbanned...?
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 8,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by lkchris View Post
Dave, you surely know that the reason is increasing pollution regulations. Just like fuel and motor oil don't need sulphur, they don't really need the soot producers, either, and oils are just getting better.
Yep, I know it's emissions related. But they're generally pulling additives that our engines like. And I'm not so sure the newer formulas can handle the soot load that our older, indirect-injection engines produce. The newer cars make far less soot, so the new oils don't need to deal with it. And they can't have certain oil additives which could plug the fancy new particulate traps. You'll notice that the TBN of the new D-1 ESP is lower than the previous formula... and lower TBN is never a good thing, IMO.


BTW, check out this M-1 Product Guide (PDF file). There is a note on M-1 TDT that says it will be reformulated in early 2008 to meet CJ-4 specs, and phosphorus will be reduced to "0.11"... but it doesn't explain how "0.11" relates to the previous phosphorus level of 1300 ppm. Fortunately I had saved an older version, which makes it appear that "0.11" may indicate 1100 ppm.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-01-2008, 12:31 PM
gsxr's Avatar
Unbanned...?
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 8,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdvisorGuy View Post
Rotella synthetic 5W40 is $16.88 a gallon at Wally Mart...
Rotella Syn is not a true synthetic... go back and read post #14 for details.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-01-2008, 12:55 PM
I'm thinkin, I'm thinkin.
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, Texas
Posts: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsxr View Post
Rotella Syn is not a true synthetic... go back and read post #14 for details.
Then Shell is lieing on their site...

http://www.shell.com/home/Framework?siteId=rotella-en&FC2=/rotella-en/html/iwgen/products/zzz_lhn.html&FC3=/rotella-en/html/iwgen/products/product_rotellasynth.html


ROTELLA® T Synthetic

Fully synthetic heavy-duty engine oil.



Product Description



Shell Rotella® T Synthetic SAE 5W-40 is a fully synthetic heavy-duty diesel and gasoline engine oil developed especially to meet the requirements of North American driving.



The exclusive Shell formulation offers users exceptional performance and protection in combination with enhanced fuel economy potential over conventional 15W-40 motor oils. This synthetic multigrade engine oil meets the service requirements of virtually all four cycle diesel and many gasoline engine manufacturers.



Applications

Recommended for new and older diesel- and gasoline-powered vehicles, including personal vehicles and commercial vehicles such as on-road, off-the-road, truck rental, pickups, delivery, utility, and school bus fleetsMeets or exceeds the diesel engine requirements of API CI-4 PLUS, Cummins CES 20078, Detroit Diesel, John Deere, Dodge, Ford, GM, International, Mack EO-N Premium Plus 03, Volvo and others; For gasoline engines, it exceeds API SL.
Features/Benefits



Formulated for multipurpose use, simplifying inventory needsOutstanding wear protection and bearing corrosion control helps maximize engine lifeHelps speed cold starts even with low winter temperaturesEnhanced oxidation stability and soot control, especially at higher temperatures, aids service lifeImproved fuel economy – when compared to conventional SAE 15W-40 oilsProduct is warranted against defect and has performance which meets or exceeds virtually all equipment manufacturer’s engine oil warranty requirements.
Approvals and Recommendations

API CI-4 PLUS, CI-4, CH-4, CG-4, CF-4, CFAPI SL, SJ, SHCummins CES 20078, 20076, 20071Detroit Diesel 7SE 270Mack EO-N Premium Plus ’03, EO-N, EO-M PlusVolvo VDS 2
__________________
Sharing my partner's 2012 Forte 5dr SX til I find my next 123 or 126..
-
Do I miss being a service advisor ???
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-01-2008, 12:59 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsxr View Post
Yep, I know it's emissions related. But they're generally pulling additives that our engines like. And I'm not so sure the newer formulas can handle the soot load that our older, indirect-injection engines produce. The newer cars make far less soot, so the new oils don't need to deal with it. And they can't have certain oil additives which could plug the fancy new particulate traps. You'll notice that the TBN of the new D-1 ESP is lower than the previous formula... and lower TBN is never a good thing, IMO.
The newer engines supposedly dump more soot into the oil because of higher EGR rates, at least that's what I've been reading. Either way CJ-4 is supposed to handle soot and heat better than any previous API standard. Lower TBN is no problem because we now have ULSD. It was the relatively high sulphur in diesel fuel that previously required high TBN.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 05-01-2008, 01:01 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
The dealer has had these ESP oils for a year now, my understanding is that they have less zinc in them to keep all that emissions equipment on the new CDI's and Cummins happy.

Now I have heard of these new oils ruining cams on pretty pumped big block Chevy's, will this be a problem with our engines? I don't know if it will because those engines usualy have pretty heavy valve springs.
__________________
2016 Corvette Stingray 2LT
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-01-2008, 01:05 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318


I'll probably just buy a case of this.
__________________
2016 Corvette Stingray 2LT
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-01-2008, 01:12 PM
gsxr's Avatar
Unbanned...?
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 8,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdvisorGuy View Post
Then Shell is lieing on their site...
Yes they are. As are most of the other manufacturers. Any way you slice it, modified dyno oil ain't a true synthetic, and the performance is significantly below the Mobil / Amsoil / Red Line products.

Do you really think that stuff costing $17/gal is going to be identical to stuff costing $24-$36 per gallon? There's a reason it's so much cheaper. Do some research on the topic, you'll find out that when the marketing monkeys use the term "synthetic" they use it VERY loosely.

For an excellent summary of this topic, click this link. The only error is he states Mobile (sic) oils are Group III, which is (or at least was! incorrect. Here's a short excerpt:

Group III synthetic oils only use about 12% synthetic base stocks. The rest is hyrdocracked petroleum base stocks. For major oil companies who have their money in crude oil refining, the word "synthetic" is merely a marketing term. It does not mean 100%, but just that a percentage of synthetic base stock goes into their product.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-01-2008, 01:15 PM
gsxr's Avatar
Unbanned...?
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 8,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by DieselAddict View Post
The newer engines supposedly dump more soot into the oil because of higher EGR rates, at least that's what I've been reading. Either way CJ-4 is supposed to handle soot and heat better than any previous API standard. Lower TBN is no problem because we now have ULSD. It was the relatively high sulphur in diesel fuel that previously required high TBN.
I'm not so sure about the higher EGR rates, and soot production, in the newer engines... but I don't have any data to prove it either way. But I would expect far lower soot with the newer direct-injection diesels, at least compared to our indirect injection (OM61x / OM60x) engines.

I had been using M-1 15W-50 EP for the last couple of changes and I have not been happy with the performance overall. I was thinking "no problem, I'll just go back to D-1"... but I'm also not interested in being the guinea pig for the yet ANOTHER new reformulation.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-01-2008, 01:28 PM
gsxr's Avatar
Unbanned...?
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 8,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatterasguy View Post


I'll probably just buy a case of this.
Hattie, that AFL stuff has an even lower TBN! The old D-1 was, IIRC, about 12. The new M-1 TDT is 10.7, and I can't find a spec for the new D-1 ESP. But the Amsoil Euro 5W-40 is 8.0, yikes. Then again, Amsoil's normal DEO is also 8.0 now. The 15W-40 AME "heavy duty" stuff is still 12.1, which is more what I'm looking for. Even with ULSD, the higher the TBN, the longer you can safely extend the drain interval.

Although I like Amsoil's products, and they are a bit cheaper than Red Line, I still dislike Amsoil's marketing methods... and also that they no longer offer the older Dex-II & Dex-III ATF formulas (something Red Line still does offer). When I disagree or dislike what a particular company is doing with their products or marketing, all I can do is vote with my dollars and buy something else. In this case, it may end up being Red Line. I may contact Red Line and ask what the TBN numbers are, just out of curiousity, since they're not published in their tech specs.

Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-01-2008, 01:52 PM
I'm thinkin, I'm thinkin.
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, Texas
Posts: 440
I think for $10.88 a gallon, I'll just stick with the Rotella 15/40. It's been in my engine thru the 1st & 2nd owners..
__________________
Sharing my partner's 2012 Forte 5dr SX til I find my next 123 or 126..
-
Do I miss being a service advisor ???
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-01-2008, 01:56 PM
gsxr's Avatar
Unbanned...?
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 8,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdvisorGuy View Post
I think for $10.88 a gallon, I'll just stick with the Rotella 15/40. It's been in my engine thru the 1st & 2nd owners..
That's fine stuff, just don't let it go for more than 3-5kmi... one of the advantages of Group IV/V synthetics is the ability to go 10-20kmi between changes. Dino oil can't deal with the extended drain intervals. But it's not a problem if you don't mind changing every 3k.

Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-01-2008, 02:15 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsxr View Post
Hattie, that AFL stuff has an even lower TBN! The old D-1 was, IIRC, about 12. The new M-1 TDT is 10.7, and I can't find a spec for the new D-1 ESP. But the Amsoil Euro 5W-40 is 8.0, yikes. Then again, Amsoil's normal DEO is also 8.0 now. The 15W-40 AME "heavy duty" stuff is still 12.1, which is more what I'm looking for. Even with ULSD, the higher the TBN, the longer you can safely extend the drain interval.

Although I like Amsoil's products, and they are a bit cheaper than Red Line, I still dislike Amsoil's marketing methods... and also that they no longer offer the older Dex-II & Dex-III ATF formulas (something Red Line still does offer). When I disagree or dislike what a particular company is doing with their products or marketing, all I can do is vote with my dollars and buy something else. In this case, it may end up being Red Line. I may contact Red Line and ask what the TBN numbers are, just out of curiousity, since they're not published in their tech specs.

For one of my UOA's of Red Line 5W40 from my Jetta I paid for the TBN test. The original TBN was 7 and after 5K miles it dropped to 5.3. All the TBN does is counter acids from combustion and prevent rust. It has nothing to do with anti-wear. As long as you have a sufficient TBN, more is not better.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 05-01-2008, 02:25 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
This is API's official word on the CJ-4 oil standard:
Quote:
Introduced in 2006. For high-speed, four-stroke engines designed to meet 2007 model year on-highway exhaust emission standards. CJ-4 oils are compounded for use in all applications with diesel fuels ranging in sulfur content up to 500 ppm (0.05% by weight). However, use of these oils with greater than 15 ppm (0.0015% by weight) sulfur fuel may impact exhaust aftertreatment system durability and/or oil drain interval. CJ-4 oils are effective at sustaining emission control system durability where particulate filters CJ-4 Current and other advanced aftertreatment systems are used. Optimum protection is provided for control of catalyst poisoning, particulate filter blocking, engine wear, piston deposits, low- and high-temperature stability, soot handling properties, oxidative thickening, foaming, and viscosity loss due to shear. API CJ-4 oils exceed the performance criteria of API CI-4 PLUS, CI-4, CH-4, CG-4 and CF-4 and can effectively lubricate engines calling for those API Service Categories. When using CJ-4 oil with higher than 15 ppm sulfur fuel, consult the engine manufacturer for service interval.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 05-01-2008, 02:27 PM
gsxr's Avatar
Unbanned...?
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 8,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by DieselAddict View Post
For one of my UOA's of Red Line 5W40 from my Jetta I paid for the TBN test. The original TBN was 7 and after 5K miles it dropped to 5.3. All the TBN does is counter acids from combustion and prevent rust. It has nothing to do with anti-wear. As long as you have a sufficient TBN, more is not better.
True. But it does have an impact on extended drains. You can extend the drain interval based on two main limits... amount of soot suspended (until you reach the limit of what the oil can suspend... typically under 2% is preferred), and also until the TBN drops to roughly half of the original level. A higher TBN should allow longer intervals, but it will vary with every engine. Here's a good comment from Caterpillar:

TBN is a measure of an oil’s ability to neutralize sulfur byproducts. For older precombustion chamber diesel engines, use an API CF-4, CG-4 or CF class oil that has a minimum TBN equal to twenty times the fuel’s sulfur level. Keep the normal operating temperature in your cooling system above 180 degrees F (74 degrees C). This will limit the condensation of sulfur compound vapors that are formed during the combustion process on cylinder liner walls and the associated corrosive damage. If you don’t know the fuel’s sulfur content, use an oil with the highest TBN available of the correct API class. Consider using a reliable oil analysis service to define the oil drain interval.

Also check out pages 9-11 of this Cat PDF with some more info on TBN and how it relates to sulfur content.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page