Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-18-2009, 03:00 PM
seanarcher's Avatar
VALUE ADDED DATA
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: spacecoast
Posts: 138
123 vs 126 pros vs cons diesel

i am considereing buying a 123 or 126 diesel.
i have owned several 123 diesel but never a 126 sd.
I want to have a diesel with working a/c.
wich of these a/c systems is the easiest to work on and the most reliable?
I have seen the 240d systems with the knobs and some say they are the most reliable climate control system.I have turbo diesel now but it is a rust bucket and am worried about it being used much longer for the family.
i sat in a 88 560sl(same setup?) that had a very nice cold blowing a/c so i hope they can have a cold air system...if that requires disconnecting the heater core and doing some other things to keep the heat soak down i have no problem with that.I would like to find a nice white car too but will settle on a light colored car(i like dark colors but i live in closest to the equator florida rip your skin off mind melting heat/humidity).i have also read that the SD cars where quick sellers and were hard to keep on the shelves so to speak.this makes me think corners may be cut to get them out the door.i bet someone will say no but when you are a worker under pressure to push out product you are more prone to make mistakes.maybe i should jus stick with the 123 as the parts seem more readily available.i am thinking a 240d since a lot of peope think the climate control is the simplest.if that is so then my ideal ride for the family would be a 240d 123 from 81-83 white with crank windows.i have read that the 240d auto is weaker than the 300d trans but i have another 300d trans in the wings in case things go wrong.thanks for any info

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-18-2009, 03:12 PM
JEBalles's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Carlisle, MA
Posts: 1,225
As for climate control, the 240d will be the easiest, as it's the only one with manual. All 123s and 126s came with ac standard. I'd advise a 240d with a standard trans. Easiest car to work on. A/C in these cars are, unfortunately, notoriously problem ridden, so with either car, you'll probably have to work on the A/C eventually, if not immediately.
__________________
1983 240D 3.0T 4-speed manual, now sold

1989 Subaru GL Wagon 5-speed Touring Edition
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-18-2009, 03:35 PM
seanarcher's Avatar
VALUE ADDED DATA
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: spacecoast
Posts: 138
well im already in the mindset of finding a car without working a/c.I know the cars price will be much lower since i live in death heat FL.i want to keep it below 2k for the price.are there certain years of the 123 240d that will have a more reliable a/c sytem?i remember reading the term EVIL servo somewhere about MB,cant remember if it was a 123 body though.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-18-2009, 03:37 PM
pawoSD's Avatar
Dieselsüchtiger
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 15,438
Any car beyond 1980 will not have the evil servo system. All of the diesels in the 80's except the late 80's 603 powered cars have a very unreliable A/C compressor. The only one of our 5 MB's in my family with working A/C is my 300E....since it has the non R4 (and much more modern) A/C compressor.
__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life-
'15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800)
'17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k)
'09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k)
'13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k)
'01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km)
'16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-18-2009, 04:28 PM
oldsinner111's Avatar
lied to for years
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Elizabethton, TN
Posts: 6,250
Go with a om617.951 w126.Better fuel mileage.W123s are flying bricks,or taxicabs.
__________________
1999 w140, quit voting to old, and to old to fight, a god damned veteran
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-18-2009, 04:57 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 2,156
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldsinner111 View Post
Go with a om617.951 w126.Better fuel mileage.W123s are flying bricks,or taxicabs.
w126 is a heavier car so the fuel mileage will slightly slower. As for the A/c system go for a w126.
__________________
1986 300SDL, 211K,Dealership serviced its whole life
1991 190E 2.6(120k)
1983 300D(300k)
1977 300D(211k)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-18-2009, 05:13 PM
oldsinner111's Avatar
lied to for years
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Elizabethton, TN
Posts: 6,250
Both brick and w126 are heavy.I average 32 mpg on trips at 30.37 mpg running 35%wmo/watf.
__________________
1999 w140, quit voting to old, and to old to fight, a god damned veteran
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-18-2009, 06:13 PM
seanarcher's Avatar
VALUE ADDED DATA
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: spacecoast
Posts: 138
when did the 123 and 126 go to a better a/c compressor?after 1980?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-18-2009, 06:25 PM
oldsinner111's Avatar
lied to for years
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Elizabethton, TN
Posts: 6,250
Don't know.I do know my 26 year old AC will need new compressor,hose,dryer,switches.Thats next years Tax Refund.
__________________
1999 w140, quit voting to old, and to old to fight, a god damned veteran
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-18-2009, 06:44 PM
Scott98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Weston, FL
Posts: 1,254
I live in southern Florida and have an '82 240D with a new OE R-4 compressor and R-12. My A/C blows ICE cold.

Scott
__________________
Scott
1982 Mercedes 240D, 4 speed, 275,000
1988 Porsche 944 Turbo S (70,000)
1987 Porsche 911 Coupe 109,000 (sold)
1998 Mercedes E300 TurboDiesel 147,000 (sold)
1985 Mercedes 300D 227,000 (totaled by inattentive driver with no insurance!)
1997 Mercedes E300 Diesel 236,000 (sold)
1995 Ducati 900SS (sold)
1987 VW Jetta GLI 157,000 (sold)
1986 Camaro 125,000 (sold - P.O.S.)
1977 Corvette L82 125,000 (sold)
1965 Pontiac GTO 15,000 restored (sold)
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-18-2009, 06:45 PM
seanarcher's Avatar
VALUE ADDED DATA
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: spacecoast
Posts: 138
i think i read all that stuff can be replaced for less than 500$.anybody know where there is a writeup /article about this ?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-18-2009, 06:50 PM
Scott98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Weston, FL
Posts: 1,254
Quote:
Originally Posted by seanarcher View Post
i think i read all that stuff can be replaced for less than 500$.anybody know where there is a writeup /article about this ?
FYI, I spent $500 on the OE compressor alone. I tried cheaper ones but had no luck. Others on this forum have had better luck. I spent the money because I planned on keeping the car a looong time and wanted to do it right.

Check out dieselgiant.com for articles on A/C work.

Good luck,

Scott
__________________
Scott
1982 Mercedes 240D, 4 speed, 275,000
1988 Porsche 944 Turbo S (70,000)
1987 Porsche 911 Coupe 109,000 (sold)
1998 Mercedes E300 TurboDiesel 147,000 (sold)
1985 Mercedes 300D 227,000 (totaled by inattentive driver with no insurance!)
1997 Mercedes E300 Diesel 236,000 (sold)
1995 Ducati 900SS (sold)
1987 VW Jetta GLI 157,000 (sold)
1986 Camaro 125,000 (sold - P.O.S.)
1977 Corvette L82 125,000 (sold)
1965 Pontiac GTO 15,000 restored (sold)
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-18-2009, 07:00 PM
lietuviai's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SW WA
Posts: 5,744
I replaced all the O-rings in the system of my 300D, re-used the original compressor, a Delco R4 unit, replaced the dryer and recharged it with R-12 and it works well. The only problem is that the CCU is a bit flakey but it does manage to keep things nice and cold in the heat.
It's always a good idea to replace the dryer especially if a system has been apart or not working for a long time. They're fairly cheap. I paid less than $20 for mine.
Apart for the CCU, the manual system uses basically the same plumbing and hardware as the automatic system.
__________________
DJ


84 300D Turbodiesel 190K with 4 speed manual sold in 03/2012
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-18-2009, 09:18 PM
Hip001's Avatar
Have you seen my stapler?
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Gainesville, Georgia
Posts: 422
Quote:
Originally Posted by seanarcher View Post
when did the 123 and 126 go to a better a/c compressor?after 1980?
Sean, are you from Titusville? (name sounds familiar)

I own one of each and it depends on what you want. I'm no expert but here's what I've gathered so far. my 123(1985 300D turbo daily driver) is rock solid reliable medium on comfort and appearance. AC is ok but not great(as far as cooling goes. mine was converted to R134, they tell me that R12 is better). I was told the car got 30mpg when I bought it and the truth is I get about 23-26mpg. My 126 is a 300SDL and is the shizznit both in looks and driving(in my opinion). It is also bigger inside which is what the "L" stands for. I am having AC problems again but have yet to determine what it is yet. I prefer the 126 but keep it for weekends. The SDL has a 6cyl 3L motor and is night and day from the 300D. I have not calculated the SDL mpg but would bet it's better than the 300d. What ever car you get or think you might get, take it to Pierre here in Titusville for any service needs or questions!!
__________________

2006 Jetta TDI DSG 320k miles
1997 Ford F150 325k miles 4.2L V6 "Work Truck"
2008 Tundra 225k miles 5.7L
1982 240D.....sold
1984 300D...Totaled OUCH!
1985 300D Turbo 222k miles "Dos" sold to 79Mercy
1986 300SDL 98K miles "The Beater"....sold
1987 190E 2.3 16v Euro spec 115K miles....sold
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-18-2009, 09:28 PM
TheDon's Avatar
Ghost of Diesels Past
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 13,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oracle12345 View Post
w126 is a heavier car so the fuel mileage will slightly slower. As for the A/c system go for a w126.
actually.. incorrect..

the W126 has a lower .cd and actually gets better fuel mileage than the w123.

also.. S Class or no class!

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page