Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-02-2010, 03:22 PM
blackestate's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 948
engine swap issue

So I pulled the engine from the 300SD, which is turbo. And the engine from the 77 300D, NA.
Got the engine somewhat clean, and went to swap the pan, because I was not going to add the turbo. to the 77.

Well... the pan will not fit. I do not know what do now. Give me your recommendations..

1) put the turbo engine in the 300D and just block off the oil return lines somehow. This was a good running engine.

2) the NA engine has a massive leak from the back, near the rear main seal. But it looked ok on the pan side. I have not removed the flywheel. Also this engine had low compression. But that may have been due to running WVO on what was mostly a single tank. It had compression around 100psi before I removed it. It would not start. And I still do not know where the oil is coming from. I sat the engine on the flywheel to remove the pan, and the flywheel was covered in oil before I got the pan loose, so It will still have that issue with the new seal just in the pan side.

3) throw in the towel, and get something different.

I would like to get the 300D running, as it is a very nice car inside, and body wise. But I am very frustrated right now. And do not know how to proceed.

All I have done is major repairs to cars for the last year. ARGH!@%T

thanks

__________________
83 300SD Dark Silver Dark brown inside
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-02-2010, 03:29 PM
tbomachines's Avatar
ಠ_ಠ
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 7,375
I'm confused at what you wanted to do. Are you trying to put the turbo engine in the 300D that originally came with a NA, but planning on taking off the turbo? I don't understand why you wouldn't just put the good turbo motor into the 300D.
__________________
TC
Current stable:
- 2004 Mazda RALLYWANKEL
- 2007 Saturn sky redline
- 2004 Explorer...under surgery.

Past: 135i, GTI, 300E, 300SD, 300SD, Stealth
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-02-2010, 03:44 PM
blackestate's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 948
yes, that is what I was planning on doing. I did not plan on leaving the turbo on, because the turbo is in the way of the throttle, and as far as I know the rod to shift the trans. It is not vacuum, it is mechanical.
__________________
83 300SD Dark Silver Dark brown inside
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-02-2010, 03:52 PM
Admiral-Third World Fleet
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Central FL
Posts: 3,069
You should be able to get a throttle and cam cover lashup from a W116 300SD (turbo with the same series transmission). That's got to be a better solution than all the tinkering you are doing
__________________
80 300SD (129k mi) 82 240D stick (193k mi)77 240D auto - stick to be (153k mi) 85 380SL (145k mi) 89 BMW 535i 82 Diesel Rabbit Pickup (374k mi) 91 Jetta IDI Diesel (155k mi) 81 VW Rabbit Convertible Diesel 70 Triumph Spitfire Mk III (63kmi)66 Triumph TR4a IRS (90k mi)67 Ford F-100 (??)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-02-2010, 03:53 PM
Registered Hack
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,642
Would the pan not fit b/c of the oil pump?


Since you have the pan off, and the engine out.... I would fix the seals on the engine you want to use.

What could it be other than the rear main seal (rope style)?

is this the engine that covered that trans in oil? 85 cali?
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-02-2010, 04:05 PM
winmutt's Avatar
85 300D 4spd+tow+h4
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Atl Gawga
Posts: 9,346
NA and turbo engines are remarkably different in many aspects. Can't imagine why youd want to take the turbo off.
__________________
http://superturbodiesel.com/images/sig.04.10.jpg
1995 E420 Schwarz
1995 E300 Weiss
#1987 300D Sturmmachine
#1991 300D Nearly Perfect
#1994 E320 Cabriolet
#1995 E320 Touring
#1985 300D Sedan
OBK #42
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-02-2010, 04:16 PM
blackestate's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 948
my only reason to take the turbo off is because of the throttle issue.
I have no idea what to do about the throttle.
What parts would I need off of a W116? Would it work on a w123? All of the other cars I have are W126
__________________
83 300SD Dark Silver Dark brown inside
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-02-2010, 04:26 PM
moon161's Avatar
Formerly of Car Hell
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 2,057
The compression and valve overlap of the turbo engine are different because the 617.952 is designed to work w/boost. Seems you'd create fish out of water problems by deleting the turbo, not to mention performance and economy losses.

If you can't get set of linkages that accomodate the turbo, bodging one doesn't sound too hard, I'd look at what had to be done.

I hear that you want to keep the turbo tranny and engine together if you can.
__________________
CC: NSA

All things are burning, know this and be released.

82 Benz 240 D, Kuan Yin
12 Ford Escape 4wd

You're four times
It's hard to
more likely to
concentrate on
have an accident
two things
when you're on
at the same time.
a cell phone.


www.kiva.org It's not like there's anything wrong with feeling good, is there?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-02-2010, 04:55 PM
dadette123's Avatar
what little I know
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 240
The turbo 617 engine has a heavier crank and a larger oil capacity (7.0qt. vs. 8.5 qt.) among other differences. The lower oil pan on the 300D is 115 010 04 28 MY while the 300SD is 123 010 00 28 MY.
__________________
too many w123's
84 280 SL 5 speed
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-02-2010, 05:00 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 18,350
Why do you need to switch the oil pans?
You'd need the rod and linkage off a 116 which controls the transmission like your existing rods, except following a different route down to the transmission. I'm not sure the engine compartment of a 123 has enough space for the rod to follow the same route as it does in the 116. does anyone know for sure if it will fit?
__________________
1977 300d 70k--sold 08
1985 300TD 185k+
1984 307d 126k--sold 8/03
1985 409d 65k--sold 06
1984 300SD 315k--daughter's car
1979 300SD 122k--sold 2/11
1999 Fuso FG Expedition Camper
1993 GMC Sierra 6.5 TD 4x4
1982 Bluebird Wanderlodge CAT 3208--Sold 2/13
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-02-2010, 06:11 PM
blackestate's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 948
The reason for the oil pan switch was because of the holes left in it by removing the turbo.
But it sounds like this just is not going to work.
The trans with the trubo can not be used because it is vacuum, and also electronic speed. Where the one from the NA is mechanical, on both.
I have placed the pans back on both engines. The NA has a new rear seal in the pan side.
IF I leave it on the flywheel, and put 1 gallon of oil in it, I should know if the leak is gone right? but no guarantee that it is fixed unless it is running.
Sounds like this was a bad idea from the start....
__________________
83 300SD Dark Silver Dark brown inside
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-02-2010, 06:22 PM
Admiral-Third World Fleet
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Central FL
Posts: 3,069
Another option is to use your 300SD engine along with its 722.303 transmission.

You would need to convert the speedometer drive to a mechanical gear using the tailplate from a 722.315 (300D turbo) transmission, and then get all the W123 linkages from a 300D turbo, and bring over your 300SD vacuum control valve etc.

But I see no reason why the bellcrank from a W116 would not work in a W123- it doesn't stick out into the chassis too far IIRC. Using this 722.1xx transmission behind a turbo engine might not be a good idea.
__________________
80 300SD (129k mi) 82 240D stick (193k mi)77 240D auto - stick to be (153k mi) 85 380SL (145k mi) 89 BMW 535i 82 Diesel Rabbit Pickup (374k mi) 91 Jetta IDI Diesel (155k mi) 81 VW Rabbit Convertible Diesel 70 Triumph Spitfire Mk III (63kmi)66 Triumph TR4a IRS (90k mi)67 Ford F-100 (??)
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-02-2010, 06:32 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 18,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by rs899 View Post

But I see no reason why the bellcrank from a W116 would not work in a W123- it doesn't stick out into the chassis too far IIRC. Using this 722.1xx transmission behind a turbo engine might not be a good idea.
I was wondering if the bellcrank from the W116 might hit the firewall since there is more room in front of the firewall in a 116.
I agree that an NA transmission with a turbo engine might be problematic. I'd also try to use the turbo transmission. Even if it meant that I used a GPS instead of a speedometer.
__________________
1977 300d 70k--sold 08
1985 300TD 185k+
1984 307d 126k--sold 8/03
1985 409d 65k--sold 06
1984 300SD 315k--daughter's car
1979 300SD 122k--sold 2/11
1999 Fuso FG Expedition Camper
1993 GMC Sierra 6.5 TD 4x4
1982 Bluebird Wanderlodge CAT 3208--Sold 2/13
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-02-2010, 06:58 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 18,350
I just looked at my 116 and 123. I don't think there's enough room between the transmission and transmission tunnel for the 116 transmission control rod to fit in a 123. That must be why MB went to a bowden cable.
__________________
1977 300d 70k--sold 08
1985 300TD 185k+
1984 307d 126k--sold 8/03
1985 409d 65k--sold 06
1984 300SD 315k--daughter's car
1979 300SD 122k--sold 2/11
1999 Fuso FG Expedition Camper
1993 GMC Sierra 6.5 TD 4x4
1982 Bluebird Wanderlodge CAT 3208--Sold 2/13
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-02-2010, 07:55 PM
blackestate's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 948
So If I run the 722.1 Trans with a turbocharged engine, I will ruin the trans quickly due to the added power.
What will happen if I run the turbo engine, with no turbo, and the injection pump from the NA engine, and use the 722.1 trans? What if I swap the Cam on both engines? that would take care of the valve differences?
I am not following on changing the tail plate? is that something someone who sees the auto trans as a "black box" could do?
Any one have a good photo of the linkage on a 300D turbo?
thanks

__________________
83 300SD Dark Silver Dark brown inside
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page