Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 03-03-2004, 09:44 PM
JHZR2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,428
FYI: MB228.x vs. 229.x

I have always been curious as to the difference between the MB228.x and the 229.x oil specs. I wasnt quite sure of the differences, although Ive been told that the 228 is a HD spec adn the 229 is a LD passenger car spec.

I got my hands on the spec sheet info, and have compiled it (from http://www.ethyl.com/products/la/handbook/Crankcase.pdf). I have put them into a formatted worksheet for direct comparisson. Looking over everything, it appears that it took the 229.3 spec to match that which was the necessary requirements for 228.3, and 229.5 matches up exactly with the 228.5 spec.

It seems to me that the 229.x specs are kind of like a lesser or weaker set of the 228.x specs. The 228.x oils will be more robust in every way than their 229 counterparts. Besides the sulphur, chlorine, ash and ACEA prerequisite requirements, and the fact that the 229.x specs were also tested on an M111 engine for sludge and fuel economy improvement, I dont see any difference. I dont think that it even matters that the oils are synthetic or not, as my sources seem to point out that in other parts of the world, synthetic oil is not necessary (although in designing a lube oil, meeting the prerequisite ACEA A3 is really hard if not impossible to meet in a lower 0,5 or 10w- oil without a synthetic basestock).

My worksheet is as follows, although it doesnt show up properly, and I cant paste a pic of it because the picture is too wide/long). It is pretty straightforward, oil spec is listed across, and there are five data sets for most every criteria. I have taken out some other data with the specs of other test engines, etc. Feel free to email me directly for the excel file if you have further interest:


SHEET NUMBER: 228.3 OM602 228.5 OM602 229.1 OM602A 229.3 OM602A 229.5 OM602A
Piston Cleanliness (No ring sticking): 24 min. 26 min. 20 min. 24 min. 26 min.
Bore Polishing, %. (23mm): 4.5 max. 3.0 max. 7.0 max. 4.5 max. 3.0 max.
Cylinder Wear, avg. µm. (new/old): 15.0/10.0 max. 15.0/10.0 max. 20.0/12.0 max. 15.0 max. 15.0/10.0 max.
Cam Wear, avg. µm. (new/old): 45.0/28.0 max. 45.0/28.0 max. 50.0/30.0 max. 45.0/10.0 max. 45.0/28.0 max.
Oil Consumption, kg.: 10.0 max. 10.0 max. 10.0 max. 10.0 max. 10.0 max.
Viscosity Increase, 40°C. %: 70 max. 60 max. 90 max. 70 max. 60.0 max.
Engine Sludge, avg.: 8.9 min. 9.0 min. 8.8 min. 8.9 min 9.0 min.
Ring Sticking, ASF OM441LA: 1.0 max. OM441LA: 1.0 max.
__________________
Current Diesels:
1981 240D (73K)
1982 300CD (169k)
1985 190D (169k)
1991 350SD (116k)
1991 350SD (206k)
1991 300D (228k)
2008 ML320 CDI (199k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (442k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (267k)

Past Diesels:
1983 300D (228K), 1985 300D (233K), 1993 300D 2.5T (338k), 1993 300SD (291k)

Last edited by JHZR2; 03-03-2004 at 09:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page