![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If you have read my post regarding the damage to my car and the possibility that my insurer may call it a total you will understand my question.
Other than the cosmetics of the grill, headlight changes and the trunk lid changes are there any significant differences between the 92 500E and the two later models. I know that my 92 was rated slightly higher as far as the horsepower but does anyone out there know of how this equates to 0-60 etc. I love my 92 and the way it looks but I want to be ready to move if my insurer totals the car. Any opinions rantings and or ravings would be appreciated. Alan ![]()
__________________
92 500E Silver 66k 82 Porsche 911SC 84K 68 Cadillac ( Gone Now ) 03 Suburban Z71 200K 85 300SD 217k From Original Owner ( Dad ) |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Anyone looking for a low milage 500E or E500? | 16ver | Mercedes-Benz Performance Paddock | 2 | 11-06-2003 09:14 PM |
The Collectibility of the 500E / E500, according to Frank Barrett | suginami | Mercedes-Benz Performance Paddock | 9 | 06-10-2002 11:35 AM |
500E vs. E500 front struts | ke6dcj | Mercedes-Benz Performance Paddock | 8 | 02-04-2002 01:41 PM |
Mercedes 500E : The 4-door Porsche | Jim_Crews | Mercedes-Benz Used Parts For Sale & Wanted | 2 | 01-14-2002 10:49 AM |
500E Original Road Test Index <v. long> | Chris W. | Mercedes-Benz Performance Paddock | 10 | 10-09-2001 06:34 PM |