![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I used to just carry on my luggage, but it makes the security ordeal much more difficult, and carrying your luggage through the airport really sucks. Especially in Denver, where you are forced downstairs for the ridiculous train, then back up to concourse level. Then factor in another level up to get to the bar, not to mention the bag taking up prime real estate in the bar once I get there.;) I'm a big fan of tossing down a couple drinks before my flight, helps me sleep through the crying babies. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The answer is pretty simple, and doesn't rely on the fear mongering of a 1:1,000,000 event argument . . . simple utility and risk analysis. Adding less than 5 seconds to the procedure isn't going to substantially change that risk. |
Quote:
We try to encourage minimal clothing here anyway. ;) |
Quote:
But name a flight attendant that’s going to do a utility and risk analysis for you. I can assure you that their chain of thought is based far beyond any fear mongering and 1:1M odds. More like: When in doubt - The passenger don’t. I’m not here to argue with you. The item seems as harmless to me as it does to you. I’m just telling you that there are few flight attendants who will allow something to be installed in their aircraft that they are not sure of if they can come up with even the most far fetched, 1:50 billion odds scenario that may even hint at jeopardizing even the most silly of safety factors while they are in charge. Unless they have been shown the item and told that its use has been authorized on board the aircraft... Odds are, you’ll be asked to remove it. |
Quote:
http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/news/article.asp?docKey=600-200903192057KRTRIB__BUSNEWS_47859-553N0MTD1OTDP4BGEH4M11PIQK¶ms=timestamp||03/19/2009%208:57%20PM%20ET||headline||Baggage%20handlers%20at%20Lambert%20caught%20stealing%20from%20pass enger%20luggage%20[St.%20Louis%20Post-Dispatch]||docSource||Knight%20Ridder/Tribune||provider||ACQUIREMEDIA||realtedsyms|||US%3BEBAY&ric=EBAY.O |
Quote:
I will also say that my experiences with flight crews hasn't always been as draconian as suggested and depending on the experience of the employee, it's a coin toss as to what side prevails. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I’m just saying that far more than not, the crews are going to nix the locks. I’m not quite sure what the odds of it happening are. But can you just imagine sitting across the isle from a cmbdiesel type person sitting in front of a guy with those locks in place? And the lock user just happens to say: “They aren’t a safety issue and the FAA says they aren’t illegal…” That would beat the hell out of any in-flight movie, that’s for sure. All flight crews know that of the xxx folks on the plane, there is a cmbdiesel sitting somewhere. Perhaps a few, in fact. Not to mention a few of the “It’s my right” types as well. They’re not draconian. They’re just covering their ass. Saying: “Sorry. No can do.” is the easiest way for them to do just that. |
Quote:
I guarantee they will agree with you. I also guarantee that you’d be better off not using that tone with them or another passenger. Right or wrong. ;) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website