![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Einstein: The hardest thing in the world to understand is the income tax
That means taxpayers could be covering roughly half of the $20 billion pledged by BP for a fund to compensate people and businesses harmed by the disaster.
BP Likely to Seek $10B Tax Credit Due to Losses from Spill |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Question Authority before it Questions you. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
And still the guys who are too stupid to drill a hole in the ground without blowing up the rig killing people, turtles and pelicans while unemploying every one in the Gulf region got one like this over on the apotheosis of the Liberal Brain Trust? Try not to let is destroy your faith in this historic Presidency! |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Question Authority before it Questions you. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Isn't the Dear Leader the CEO of the nation who made this deal with BP which is the subject of the link provided by the original poster? The thread isn't about what BP's culpability or liabilities are, it’s about how the Smartest President in the history of the country stood there on national television and sanctimoniously told the sheeple how he was making BP pay for something. Now we all learn that in reality BP will be eligible to claim a tax credit for any corporate loss that payout incurs. The reality is the Dear leader and all his administration toadies where too Effing stupid to anticipate this reality. They as do many other liberal group thinkers believe that money comes from some place other than the consumer population. The 20 Billion won't be printed in the PB corporate printing department it will come from the consumers of BP products/services. If PB doesn't make a profit i.e. takes in more money than it pays out, there is nothing to put in the 20 Billion Obama End of the Rainbow Redistribution Money Pot. If BP looses money because it has to fill that pot the tax code allows them and every other corporation to claim a percentage of the yearly loss as a tax credit. Any tax credit can only be offset by other tax payers contributing more. It's simple arithmetic not quantum mechanics!
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
I agree with Willens. They are entitled under the law to claim a current year expense deduction for the cleanup costs. If this causes a current year loss and they can claim a Net operating loss carryback, and recover income taxes they paid in prior years, so be it. Don't like it? Change the law. How? Make an exception to the ordinary and necessary business expense definition for cleanup costs & make them capitalize it and recover it over 40 years or make future "settlements" take the form of non deductible penalties. Neither of those is likely to happen imho.
Quit crying, unless you want two differrent sets of rules.. one for big corps and one for the little guys. Like the article says, little guy makes 1 million in year 1, pays 350k in taxes. He loses 1 million in yr 2. He can then carryback the loss and offset the current loss against the prior year income. Net overall 2 yr. economc effect? No income and no tax liabilty. What's unjust about that? Works for 100k income taxpayers and 100 billion income taxpayers. Dig it! I'm no Einstein, but I can understand this. ![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Well, the tax code says what is says; certain expenses are deductible. If you want to change the rules, change the rules to disallow these kinds of expenses for everyone. If you want to punish BP, fine them or sue them for the damages they caused.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Yep, our government should sue them on behalf of all the people who are affected.
__________________
2016 Corvette Stingray 2LT 1969 280SE 2023 Ram 1500 2007 Tiara 3200 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
The same government who regulated, licenced and approved BP's drilling plan, inspected the rig ten days prior, and awarded them for their saftey record last year on behalf of all the people who are affected?
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Their MD has got his punishment, off to Siberia for next winter.
__________________
Grumpy Old Diesel Owners Club group I no longer question authority, I annoy authority. More effect, less effort.... ![]() 1967 230-6 auto parts car. rust bucket. 1980 300D now parts car 800k miles 1984 300D 500k miles ![]() 1987 250td 160k miles English import ![]() 2001 jeep turbo diesel 130k miles ![]() 1998 jeep tdi ~ followed me home. Needs a turbo. 1968 Ford F750 truck. 6-354 diesel conversion. Other toys ~J.D.,Cat & GM ~ mainly earth moving |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
http://i680.photobucket.com/albums/v...7/scotflag.gif http://i680.photobucket.com/albums/v.../scot2flag.gif "If women are so bloody perfect at multitasking how come they can't have a headache and sex at the same time?" Billy Connolly |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
The laws are for everyone. BP is gonna make every effort to reduce their losses and if they are entitled to a tax credit by law that's the way it goes.
Lets drill some more and let the public pay for the cleanup of spills. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Then lets shut down all the nuclear plants. Then we can all hold hands and sing kumbyya--as there won't be enough energy to actually do anything else. This "either / or" arguing is silly.
__________________
1982 300SD " Wotan" ..On the road as of Jan 8, 2007 with Historic Tags ![]() |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
we are hooked on oil like a drug addict needs a fix. last I checked, mercedes automobiles require either gasoline or diesel to operate. as long as their is a market for a product and the end users demand it, the oil boys will continue to drill baby drill.
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|