Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-08-2011, 06:56 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,601
Big Muddy

Gettin' bigger.

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2011/0508/Memphis-and-Baton-Rouge-brace-for-record-breaking-Mississippi-flood

Check your river gages here: http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/rt

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-08-2011, 06:59 PM
The Swede's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 286
As a kid, I jumped it.
__________________
'07 Yukon 2500
'13 Subaru Outback 3.6R
'13 Orbea Carpe 9-speed

Currently Benzless
Formerly: 300TD, S600, E55, 560SEL

---= The forest breathes, listen.
-Native American elder
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-08-2011, 07:03 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 18,350
"Mississippi could be flowing at 1.9 million cubic feet per second near the Morganza Spillway later this week."

That is an incredible amount of water. The most I've ever paddled on is probably around 40-50k cfs on the Liard River. Colorado in the Grand Canyon typically does not run about about 35k cfs.
__________________
1977 300d 70k--sold 08
1985 300TD 185k+
1984 307d 126k--sold 8/03
1985 409d 65k--sold 06
1984 300SD 315k--daughter's car
1979 300SD 122k--sold 2/11
1999 Fuso FG Expedition Camper
1993 GMC Sierra 6.5 TD 4x4
1982 Bluebird Wanderlodge CAT 3208--Sold 2/13
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-08-2011, 07:08 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,601
I attended a briefing hosted by the NOLA District, USACE. The colonel said their models indicate that this flood will exceed the 1973 flood by quite a bit. That was the flood that nearly changed the course of the Mississippi River and a complete re-engineering of the lower MS management system. Col also said that this one could rival or even exceed 1927 flood.

The 1927 flood extended from lower Illinois to New Orleans and from half-way across the state of Mississippi to half-way across the state of Louisiana. The 1927 flood is why we have Chicago blues -- the flood caused the largest single-event migration of Americans in history.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-08-2011, 07:31 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
Rivers flood, this should do wonders for flood insurance.
__________________
1999 SL500
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-08-2011, 07:34 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,601
Paradoxically, much of Louisiana Louisiana is in severe drought.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-08-2011, 07:41 PM
Kuan's Avatar
unband
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: At the Birkebeiner
Posts: 3,860
Is this going to be THE 100 year flood? I know further North it wasn't too bad. We crest here early and almost all of it is snowmelt. Parts of St. Paul were closed this year but have since reopened.
__________________
You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows - Robert A. Zimmerman
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-08-2011, 07:50 PM
cmac2012's Avatar
Renaissances Dude
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 35,450
I hear reports about evacuating Memphis. What, all of Memphis or is there a lower riverside area?

On a trivial note, the Memphis NBA team enjoying unprecedented success in the playoffs. Not that the nation needs a reminder that Memphis is flooding, but games being moved, postponed whatever will no doubt bring it more to the attention of people who don't follow the news much.
__________________
Te futueo et caballum tuum

1986 300SDL, 362K
1984 300D, 138K
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-08-2011, 08:00 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,601
A lot of Memphis is low-lying. It is a river town. As Hattie alluded to, we as a nation fupped duck when we started leveeing to protect populations.Every leveed town means that the water must go somewhere else, which floods another town. Bam, 150 years later we have a river system between two levees. This helps to force the river to self-scour its bed which makes shipping safer for larger vessels.

However, instead of spreading over a large area and slowly receding, water is shunted immediately into the river system causing a huge bulge of water to zoom down the system. If the lower system is already saturated then the water has nowhere to go but up.

Also, the river scouring slowly moves upstream just as a waterfall etches the land upstream, receding higher into the elevation. This scouring proceeds up each tributary, too. This causes local bank erosion and then of course, screams for bank stabilization projects and channelization projects, further exacerbating the problem of increased velocity.

We have created a giant positive feedback loop and we cannot find a way out. Your congressmen love USACE projects in your district.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-08-2011, 09:11 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,601
Good description of the problem from a business perspective: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703864204576311493351900976.html
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-08-2011, 09:22 PM
cmac2012's Avatar
Renaissances Dude
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 35,450
Where I'm in the dark is: does flooding of farmland with mega acre-feet of water help on some level, the way it did historically, or is water contaminated these days with various chemicals that were just not lying about in centuries past?

I was just reading again about the intentional breaching of the levee which will send much water onto Missouri farmland.
__________________
Te futueo et caballum tuum

1986 300SDL, 362K
1984 300D, 138K
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-08-2011, 09:45 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,601
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmac2012 View Post
Where I'm in the dark is: does flooding of farmland with mega acre-feet of water help on some level, the way it did historically, or is water contaminated these days with various chemicals that were just not lying about in centuries past?

I was just reading again about the intentional breaching of the levee which will send much water onto Missouri farmland.
Normal overbank flooding by a river is a slow rise. Dynamiting a levee with 8-10 ft of head results in tremendous scouring as the water rushes over the farmland. The topsoil will be removed and deposited somewhere else. the farmland will be transformed from flat, easily tilled land to a corduroy landscape which the farmer will have to spend time and money re-leveling.

Had the USACE breached the levee before the flood level neared the top of the levee it would have still flooded the land but would not have scoured it. Indeed, overbank flooding is a great source of natural soil fertility and helps maintain a water table accessible to roots without having to irrigate. One silly thing in modern agriculture is to have a farm near a river using well irrigation. It is unbelievably common. That's a direct result of river management policy.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-08-2011, 10:31 PM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst View Post
A lot of Memphis is low-lying. It is a river town. As Hattie alluded to, we as a nation fupped duck when we started leveeing to protect populations.Every leveed town means that the water must go somewhere else, which floods another town. Bam, 150 years later we have a river system between two levees. This helps to force the river to self-scour its bed which makes shipping safer for larger vessels.

However, instead of spreading over a large area and slowly receding, water is shunted immediately into the river system causing a huge bulge of water to zoom down the system. If the lower system is already saturated then the water has nowhere to go but up.

Also, the river scouring slowly moves upstream just as a waterfall etches the land upstream, receding higher into the elevation. This scouring proceeds up each tributary, too. This causes local bank erosion and then of course, screams for bank stabilization projects and channelization projects, further exacerbating the problem of increased velocity.

We have created a giant positive feedback loop and we cannot find a way out. Your congressmen love USACE projects in your district.
This is an excellent easy to understand summary of the problem with the Mississippi.
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-09-2011, 12:25 AM
cmac2012's Avatar
Renaissances Dude
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 35,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst View Post
Normal overbank flooding by a river is a slow rise. Dynamiting a levee with 8-10 ft of head results in tremendous scouring as the water rushes over the farmland. The topsoil will be removed and deposited somewhere else. the farmland will be transformed from flat, easily tilled land to a corduroy landscape which the farmer will have to spend time and money re-leveling.

Had the USACE breached the levee before the flood level neared the top of the levee it would have still flooded the land but would not have scoured it. Indeed, overbank flooding is a great source of natural soil fertility and helps maintain a water table accessible to roots without having to irrigate. One silly thing in modern agriculture is to have a farm near a river using well irrigation. It is unbelievably common. That's a direct result of river management policy.
Oh mah Ghod. An extra dimension added. No wonder they're pissed.

What I was uncertain about was whether water that likely flooded small bergs upstream picked up any and all petro distillate available and transferred that down to the floodplain. And then there's the drawback of one's buildings getting flooded. Prior to large permanent communities, regular flooding wouldn't have had as much downside, I can only imagine.

I mean just guessing, but I could see a calculation in value of topsoil added to value of building damaged. I mean of course I get the value of adding soil the way it's always been done in those regions, but I could see farmers having a different POV.
__________________
Te futueo et caballum tuum

1986 300SDL, 362K
1984 300D, 138K
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-09-2011, 12:29 AM
Craig
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Sounds like a mess. I was working at a power plant on the Missouri River during the 1993 flood; failed levies, flooded roads, entire small towns underwater, etc. Not fun.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page