Ted Skidmark better watch out

[elchivito]

OH NOOOOES!!!

Scary Obama death squads target gun rights activists.

The Latest Right-Wing Conspiracy Theory: Obama Death Squads Targeting Gun-Rights Activists | Mother Jones

[Air&Road]

[Chris Bell]

But on the other hand...
Obama memo justifies drone-war killing of Americans | The Ticket - Yahoo! News

[MTI]

Why Chris, the ACLU had no idea you cared.

[Jim B.]

Originally Posted by Chris Bell

But on the other hand...
Obama memo justifies drone-war killing of Americans | The Ticket - Yahoo! News

From the article:

The memo says “an informed, high-level official of the U.S. government” must decide that the target is a "senior operational leader" of al-Qaida or "associated forces"; “poses an imminent threat of violent attack against the United States”; and that an attempt to capture that individual is “infeasible.”

“Targeting a member of an enemy force who poses an imminent threat of violent attack to the United States is not unlawful. It is a lawful act of self-defense,” the document asserts.


The memo has NOT, however, been quoted as saying how such individuals can be identified;

But one clue would be they are worthy of close scrutiny when seen wearing picnic tablercloths on top of their heads.

[elchivito]

Originally Posted by Jim B.

From the article:

The memo says “an informed, high-level official of the U.S. government” must decide that the target is a "senior operational leader" of al-Qaida or "associated forces"; “poses an imminent threat of violent attack against the United States”; and that an attempt to capture that individual is “infeasible.”

“Targeting a member of an enemy force who poses an imminent threat of violent attack to the United States is not unlawful. It is a lawful act of self-defense,” the document asserts.


The memo has NOT, however, been quoted as saying how such individuals can be identified;

But one clue would be they are worthy of close scrutiny when seen wearing picnic tablercloths on top of their heads.

Yeah, but the headline is so much easier to read.

[Chris Bell]

Originally Posted by Jim B.

From the article:

The memo says “an informed, high-level official of the U.S. government” must decide that the target is a "senior operational leader" of al-Qaida or "associated forces"; “poses an imminent threat of violent attack against the United States”; and that an attempt to capture that individual is “infeasible.”

“Targeting a member of an enemy force who poses an imminent threat of violent attack to the United States is not unlawful. It is a lawful act of self-defense,” the document asserts.


The memo has NOT, however, been quoted as saying how such individuals can be identified;

But one clue would be they are worthy of close scrutiny when seen wearing picnic tablercloths on top of their heads.

Define enemy force..Al Queda, Hamas, Hezbollah, Tea Party.

[Woody Worker]

Originally Posted by Chris Bell

Define enemy force..Al Queda, Hamas, Hezbollah, Tea Party.

Don't worry, that definition will be left up to the Pride of Arizona - Big Sis, Mr. Janet Napolitano, and you already know where she stands on this matter, she told you in her April 2009 Report on Domestic Terrorism

http://www.fas.org/irp/eprint/rightwing.pdf

[Air&Road]

Yes a Christian who happens to own a gun should be watching the sky for drones and be prepared to duck if Big Sis gets his way.

[Chris Bell]

Originally Posted by Air&Road

Yes a Christian who happens to own a gun should be watching the sky for drones and be prepared to duck if Big Sis gets his way.

Well..A white Christian should keep a look out.

[t walgamuth]

Originally Posted by Chris Bell

Define enemy force..Al Queda, Hamas, Hezbollah, Tea Party.

Definately tea party.

[Jim B.]

Originally Posted by Chris Bell

Define enemy force..Al Queda, Hamas, Hezbollah, Tea Party.

Loosely, ALL fundamentalist religions and extreme uncompromising anti-intellectual political movements are the enemy of free thinking and democracy, as I see it.

Political lobbying in the pursuit of pure greed is no frriend of democracy either.

[Dudesky]

Originally Posted by Chris Bell

Define enemy force..Al Queda, Hamas, Hezbollah, Tea Party.

Or your kid in college involved in a touchy feely cause that someone at 1600 thinks to be threat.

[Chris Bell]

Originally Posted by Jim B.

Loosely, ALL fundamentalist religions and extreme uncompromising anti-intellectual political movements are the enemy of free thinking and democracy, as I see it.

Political lobbying in the pursuit of pure greed is no frriend of democracy either.

Great, so now we have expanded it to include anybody who's religous beliefs differ form the party occupying the White House and lobbyists.

[MagnumPI]

I think democracy is the biggest enemy of free thought...