Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-30-2013, 12:30 PM
A Talent for Obfuscation
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: In the Deep State
Posts: 18,574
The Aluminum Pickup Truck

Ford will soon introduce its next generation of Ford F-150, which will make extensive use of aluminum in bodypanels, etc. Weight savings would be in the range of several hundred lbs., with a resultant significant fuel economy gain. This should tie in nicely Ford's smaller displacement turboed Ecoboost engines now available in the current F-150.

Pickup owners are not typically a technically adventurous bunch, with tough steel-bodied, cast-iron V8-engined models as their conveyance of preference. Do you foresee any backlash from prospective pickup truck buyers faced with the prospect of an aluminum-bodied turbo V6 powered replacement for their trusty 5.4 V8-engined F-150? Will loyal Ford owners flee to Rams and Silverados in droves?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-30-2013, 12:35 PM
Mölyapina's Avatar
User title not in use
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Chelmsford, Massachusetts
Posts: 4,373
I question how much of the F150's market is made up of traditional pickup owners, and there is a crowd in there who will ONLY buy a Chevy/Ford/Dodge that will probably buy Ford no matter what happens.

Wonder what the panZZer would say...
__________________
"Senior Luna, your sense of humor is still loco... but we love it, anyway." -rickymay ____ "Your sense of humor is still loco... " -MBeige ____ "Señor Luna, your sense of humor is quite järjetön" -Delibes

1982 300SD -- 211k, Texas car, tranny issues ____ 1979 240D 4-speed 234k -- turbo and tuned IP, third world taxi hot rod

2 Samuel 12:13: "David said to Nathan, “I have sinned against the Lord.” And Nathan said to David, “The Lord also has put away your sin; you shall not die."
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-30-2013, 12:49 PM
Aquaticedge's Avatar
Bump on a log
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: See Biography
Posts: 3,148
I'd drive it. I've seen some designs supposidly of the truck, it looks nice and hopefully it'd perform well, I look forward to seeing them on the road,
__________________
hum.....
1987 300TD 311,000M Stolen. Presumed destroyed
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-30-2013, 12:52 PM
iwrock's Avatar
roflmonster
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hella NorCal
Posts: 3,313
Quote:
Originally Posted by P.C. View Post
Ford will soon introduce its next generation of Ford F-150, which will make extensive use of aluminum in bodypanels, etc. Weight savings would be in the range of several hundred lbs., with a resultant significant fuel economy gain. This should tie in nicely Ford's smaller displacement turboed Ecoboost engines now available in the current F-150.

Pickup owners are not typically a technically adventurous bunch, with tough steel-bodied, cast-iron V8-engined models as their conveyance of preference. Do you foresee any backlash from prospective pickup truck buyers faced with the prospect of an aluminum-bodied turbo V6 powered replacement for their trusty 5.4 V8-engined F-150? Will loyal Ford owners flee to Rams and Silverados in droves?
The 5.4 wasn't the best of engines - had problems with something in the valvetrain that causes a knocking sound. IIRC, Ford replaced this engine with the Coyote 5.0 in '12 or '13.

As far as the changes to the build of the truck, I doubt the use of aluminum or change in weight will really make more people buy an F150, but if the economy gets better, especially with the Ecoboost engine, I do see more buyers flocking to the F150.
__________________
-Justin

91 560 SEC AMG - other dogs dd
01 Honda S2000 - dogs dd
07 MB ML320 CDI - dd
16 Lexus IS250 - wifes dd

it's automatic.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-30-2013, 12:54 PM
MTI's Avatar
MTI MTI is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 10,626
It assumes that new truck buyers are all traditionalist, which I would be surprised if true. Otherwise, they would all look, drive and perform like they did in the 1950's.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-09-2014, 08:34 AM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTI View Post
It assumes that new truck buyers are all traditionalist, which I would be surprised if true. Otherwise, they would all look, drive and perform like they did in the 1950's.
I'm still pissed I can't get a 3 on a tree.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-30-2013, 12:54 PM
A Talent for Obfuscation
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: In the Deep State
Posts: 18,574
I'm wondering if the perceived fragility of aluminum as compared to steel will be of a concern to prospective buyers.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-30-2013, 01:04 PM
iwrock's Avatar
roflmonster
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hella NorCal
Posts: 3,313
Quote:
Originally Posted by P.C. View Post
I'm wondering if the perceived fragility of aluminum as compared to steel will be of a concern to prospective buyers.
Doubtful. Think average-joe-contractor.

Most of the people I talk to are more scared of powertrain changes than structural changes...

"Ford switched to a 100% boxed frame" - really, what's that mean?
"GMC uses a hydroformed frame" - really, what's that mean?


People don't know/don't care about thus kind of stuff. They are more aware of "8 speed automatic with a new diesel in the Ram?!?!" or "Bigger engine in the Silverado, won't that kill mileage?"....
__________________
-Justin

91 560 SEC AMG - other dogs dd
01 Honda S2000 - dogs dd
07 MB ML320 CDI - dd
16 Lexus IS250 - wifes dd

it's automatic.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-30-2013, 01:09 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
I'd be worried about the bed getting trashed, aluminum is soft.

Why does Ford need aluminum what GM can do with steel?
__________________
2016 Corvette Stingray 2LT
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-31-2013, 07:55 AM
JB3 JB3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 7,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatterasguy View Post
I'd be worried about the bed getting trashed, aluminum is soft.

Why does Ford need aluminum what GM can do with steel?
Its probably some aluminum alloy and pretty durable.

Honestly, I'm waiting to put my money down on the first truck body built by rubbermaid. Let's see a steel or aluminum body shrug off a hit with a sledge hammer the same way a plastic trash can will. I actually managed to crack the body? No problem, where's my drill and package of zip ties.

Scratch? No problem, my dark grey matte truck is plastic pigmented, not painted, and can never ever rust
__________________
This post brought to you by Carl's Jr.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-31-2013, 08:06 AM
elchivito's Avatar
¡Ay Jodido!
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rancho Disparates
Posts: 4,075
Quote:
Originally Posted by JB3 View Post
Its probably some aluminum alloy and pretty durable.

Honestly, I'm waiting to put my money down on the first truck body built by rubbermaid. Let's see a steel or aluminum body shrug off a hit with a sledge hammer the same way a plastic trash can will. I actually managed to crack the body? No problem, where's my drill and package of zip ties.

Scratch? No problem, my dark grey matte truck is plastic pigmented, not painted, and can never ever rust
Seems like a good idea but it'd imagine not easy to pull off. I had a big Rubbermaid cross bed tool box in my Ford. After a couple of AZ summers the lid was so warped it wouldn't close. It's a water trough now.
Didn't Saturns originally have some sort of composite body panels?
__________________
You're a daisy if you do.
__________________________________
84 Euro 240D 4spd. 220.5k sold
04 Honda Element AWD
1985 F150 XLT 4x4, 351W with 270k miles, hay hauler
1997 Suzuki Sidekick 4x4
1993 Toyota 4wd Pickup 226K and counting
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-30-2013, 01:00 PM
oldsinner111's Avatar
lied to for years
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Elizabethton, TN
Posts: 6,304
I'd perfer a cast iron engine for a truck,something that could get warm towing that would not warp.As far as body,its about time.However want my steel frame.
__________________
1999 w140, quit voting to old, and to old to fight, a god damned veteran, deutschland deutschland uber alles uber alles in der welt
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-30-2013, 01:10 PM
iwrock's Avatar
roflmonster
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hella NorCal
Posts: 3,313
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldsinner111 View Post
I'd perfer a cast iron engine for a truck,something that could get warm towing that would not warp.As far as body,its about time.However want my steel frame.
Cast iron is a dinosaur, especially in modern cars/trucks.

The Duramax is an iron block and has aluminum heads. People were scared of them warping over time, but they have withstood the test of time!

IIRC, the VM motori diesel in the Ram 1500 is going to use aluminum heads as well.

Hell, Ford is using a compressed graphite-iron for the block in the 6.7 with aluminum heads and in stock form, and it performs better than the old 7.3/6.0 cast iron monsters they once used.
__________________
-Justin

91 560 SEC AMG - other dogs dd
01 Honda S2000 - dogs dd
07 MB ML320 CDI - dd
16 Lexus IS250 - wifes dd

it's automatic.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-30-2013, 05:35 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: St. Thomas PA
Posts: 957
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldsinner111 View Post
I'd perfer a cast iron engine for a truck,something that could get warm towing that would not warp.As far as body,its about time.However want my steel frame.
Good luck with that. There's only one left- the 6.7 Cummins.
__________________
'83 300D, 126K miles.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-30-2013, 01:09 PM
MTI's Avatar
MTI MTI is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 10,626
I wonder what percentage of the pickups are fleet sales, and that's where the fuel economy numbers, along with payload and MTBF gets attention.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page