Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

View Poll Results: What is your choice?
Tell her to do it! The money is good and there are no ethical/legal issues to worry about. 2 12.50%
Tell her not to do it. They money may be good but it sounds illegal and is definitely unethical. 8 50.00%
It's her choice, I'm not bothered by the legal/ethical aspects. 1 6.25%
I'm dialing the IRS as we speak... and it will be on the 10 o'clock news. 5 31.25%
Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 08-09-2013, 10:55 AM
He/Him
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: DC Metro/Maryland
Posts: 15,402
Ethics question.

I'd like some opinion on this. I've been in a discussion with a few people concerning both the legal and ethical nature of a certain situation. I think it's both illegal and morally reprehensible, but quite of few others have disagreed with me.

Because I'm not an idiot I'm not going to give names, places, companies out. Therefore I have written out the details in such a way to give the full scope of the issue without revealing anything.


A friend's current employer offered her an overseas assignment in [a country], but told her that they would not pay her a salary while she would be there. Instead, her employer would cover the cost of her housing, her food, her car, and other incidental expenses, as well as paying for her to take an annual vacation and also paying for her children to attend an undergraduate program. Additionally, she would get a part time gardener, housekeeper and cook paid for through the same reimbursement system.

The company has told her, however, that she wouldn't be allowed to have a personal bank account in [a country] to handle the reimbursement funds, but that her employer would keep a joint account for her in the United States through which all of her household expenses (and the company's payment of them) would be processed as "reimbursements" on her behalf (by an account in her and the company name). She was told to agree to not represent to others that she will be paid for her services while in [a country], and that she is not to discuss the arrangement of the company paying her expenses with her personal financial advisors, nor with friends, nor with family, nor even with other employees who work in similar positions. Nor is she to report the reimbursements to either the IRS or Swiss tax authorities.

Does this sound kosher to any of you?
__________________
Onus probandi incumbit ei qui dicit, non ei qui negat

I recondition w123/w126/w124/w140/r107/r129/ steering boxes!


1984 300D "Elsa" odo reset 6/2011 147k
1983 300TD "Mitzi" ~268k OM603 powered
1995 E300 "Adelheid" 262k [Sold]

Last edited by martureo; 08-09-2013 at 01:19 PM. Reason: Removed "Switzerland" as the supposed country to avoid any more confusion
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page