What We Will Not Hear From The President Tonight

[mikemover]

In George W. Bush’s third State of the Union message we will NOT hear …

-That people who complain about tax cuts for the rich should go get a job from a poor person.

-Any plans to eliminate one single government spending program, let alone one major government department.

-That it was the goal of our founding fathers to limit government as much as practicable, not to expand it as much as possible.

-That France is a main component of the Axis of Wimps and that the American taxpayers are, and should be weary of bailing out this ungrateful nation every time they hear a bump under their unkempt beds.

-That the key to improving our nation’s government schools is not to spend more money, but rather to reduce the power of teacher’s unions and return to teaching basics.

-That another key to improving education is to give parents the choice of using their hard-earned money to send their children to a school chosen by them, not by politicians.

-That it was a mistake to create 60,000 new government employees by federalizing airport security screeners.

-That interns are now safe in the White House.

-That many of the problems we are having with North Korea are the result of six years of inattention by the Clinton administration.

-That the United States is a Constitutional Republic, not a democracy, and that democracies are unstable and enemies of personal liberty.

-That, contrary to the bleatings of Teddy Kennedy, Bush celebrates the concept of the individual over the collective whole.

-That logic and common sense would dictate that a person who does not pay federal income taxes is not entitled to an income tax break.

-That any reduction in Social Security or Medicare taxes for one individual only means an increase in Social Security and Medicare taxes for another. In other words, that the Democrat cries for “payroll” tax cuts is just another income redistribution scheme.

-That our founding fathers felt that in times of peace 95% of all government should come from the local level .. and that this is a concept that should be revised.



Mike