Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Tech Help

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-18-2006, 01:07 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Jonesboro, AR
Posts: 172
Experts weigh in, please; '91 420SEL

I am to look at a 1991 420SEL, on Monday. It is a one-owner, Arizona car with 109K miles. Dealer claims to have all service records with the vehicle.

I intend to try to purchase for somewhere in the $6-6500 range. I need a quick course in this model Benz with as much good, bad, and ugly as you feel like providing. Previous or current owners, techs, please help me in this.

TIA
__________________
1980 300SD 146K miles.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-18-2006, 02:13 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ocean Isle Beach, NC
Posts: 2,532
Never owned one and don't know them that well, but I seem to recall that there are plastic oiler tubes that deteriorate and must be replaced or you're looking at damaged camshafts. I understand that it is a very cheap and easy fix and ought to be a routine maintenance item. Maybe others with more info can chime in on this one.

Len
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-18-2006, 04:35 PM
This space for sale
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,384
If I were you, I'd hold out and find a 560SEL. One can be bought at the same price range.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-18-2006, 05:20 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Southern California, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,538
I'm pretty sure the "oiler tubes" affect M119 engines only, not the one in the 420 or 560 SEL.
__________________
Paul S.

2001 E430, Bourdeaux Red, Oyster interior.
79,200 miles.

1973 280SE 4.5, 170,000 miles. 568 Signal Red, Black MB Tex. "The Red Baron".
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-18-2006, 07:55 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snibble
If I were you, I'd hold out and find a 560SEL. One can be bought at the same price range.

Why snibble?
Something wrong with the 420SEL? They look identical to me, except for the 5.2 liter in yours?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-18-2006, 09:12 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 56
I would take the 420 over a 560 any day, the difference in power is not that much. Plus you don't have to deal with the possible problems with with rear hyd shocks. These were a hard ride from the factory, and expensive to fix if there is a problem.

On a 420 you can just change the shocks for a part cost of less than $200. for OEM shocks.
__________________
1994 E320 Cabriolet
1992 300CE (Sold)
1991 300SE (Sold)
1986 560SEL (Sold)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-18-2006, 09:28 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
They need the timing chain and rails done every 100k like clock work. Don't try and put this off on a M116 or you will be looking for a new engine.

If no record of them being changed comes with the car plan on spending $500-$1k right off the bat.

Other then that basic W126 problems that have been talked about to death. Rust shouldn't be an issue with an AZ car.
__________________
2016 Corvette Stingray 2LT
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-18-2006, 10:46 PM
This space for sale
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,384
Quote:
Originally Posted by Messier11
Why snibble?
Something wrong with the 420SEL? They look identical to me, except for the 5.2 liter in yours?
Only the outside is same.

Inside and under the hood its different. The 560 came with all the luxury options and had burlwood as opposed to zebrano. The engines on the 560 are a little more lineant on timing chain tensioners breaking than the 420. Oh and the 560 has a 5.6L not 5.2.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-19-2006, 06:44 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Jonesboro, AR
Posts: 172
Not yet convinced

Hatterasguy says: "They need the timing chain and rails done every 100k like clock work. Don't try and put this off on a M116 or you will be looking for a new engine."

I've read a few hundred posts re timing chains, and I am under the impression that the 420 has an M117 engine. This timing chain issue reminds me of the many "oil change" threads; not much agreement to be found.

Does the M117 engine have the double chain? Is it the chain, the rails, or the tensioner that should be the more-closely monitored? Obviously, if I'm to go with the aforementioned vehicle, I'll go through all the records, and just as obviously, will not want to take any chances for a TC failure, but don't want to spend unnecessary money, either.

One thread I read through suggested to line up TDC on #1 cylinder, and check to see if the cam tower mark lines up with the mark on the gear as a way to check stretch. Theory being that no stretch meant no problem with the TC. Later in the same thread, it was suggested these double-row (if that is what the M117 has) are virtually bulletproof from the factory, and that the tensioners were all that needed to be replaced at the 100k interval.

Where is Larry Bible when I need him?

Thanks for all the commentary, and please keep it coming.

While I'm at it, what kind of fuel consumption am I to expect on the 420SEL?
__________________
1980 300SD 146K miles.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page