|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Four Questions About E300/e320
I'm looking at trading my W123 300d for a newer E300 or 320, and have four questions that I'd very much appreciate some guidance on.
1) Is there a best year for these cars? I've looked at everything from a '90 E300 to a '98 E320. 2) Which years had the problem with bad wiring harnesses? 3) What kind of fuel consumption can you look for in normal highway driving? 4) Is the 320 twin cam engine with variable cam an improvement over the 300 SOHC. In other words, does the added complexity pay for itself? Thanks for any comments. SEO |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Lately, it seems as though your old 300D may have almost as much value as an E320. The prices I see on ebay, wow!
The wiring harness problem is generally thought to affect 92-95 model years. I have heard of a few '96's being affected as well. '93 to '95 I believe are ALL affected guaranteed. On the highway, you can expect around 25 mpg. The '97 and '98 6-cyl E's use a v-6. Your 4th question is almost religious in nature I have both and think they are both good. The E320 M104 (twin cam straight six) does make more horsepower than the M103 and has about the same fuel consumption. Good Luck, -GH
__________________
For Now: 1992 Mercedes Benz 500SL 1998 BMW 528i 2003 Honda Element 2002 CBR600F4i 1977 Coachmen Motor Home |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The 1997 E320 W210 class has an I-6 engine.
__________________
Current Benzes 1989 300TE "Alice" 1990 300CE "Sam Spade" 1991 300CE "Beowulf" RIP (06.1991 - 10.10.2007) 1998 E320 "Orson" 2002 C320 Wagon "Molly Fox" Res non semper sunt quae esse videntur My Gallery Not in this weather! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I'm very fond of my 123, but it is rusting out. I live in Maine, about 200 yards from the ocean, where they wildly salt the roads all winter. And to add injury, the car rides back and forth to islands on the ferry service, which are veritable salt baths.
A couple years ago I bought an '84 300TD wagon with a shot engine. The idea is to transplant the 5cyl NA engine and 5-speed manual out of the rusted sedan into the wagon. Seems like a car that my teen-age kids won't be likely to get into TOO much trouble in, and good for family trips. The other day I wind down to the "local" Mercedes dealer (only two hours away) and drove a '98 C240. Nice enough car, but too small inside, and they aren't reported to get that much better mileage. SEO |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
The '92 300E was IMO the last of the great MBZ 300E cars. New type steering wheel, all the nice wood inside the car, upgraded trans which starts out in first gear, simple yet efficient M103 engine with all the upgrades from previous years. 93 was the real start of the wiring harness problems. After this, MBZ tried to cheapen their product to compete with Lexus, which looks great on the outside but has styrofoam and cheap plastic behind all the panels. Starting in 96, MBZ set out to build a cheaper car with less build time and started down the wrong road. Only in the last two years have they finally gotten their act together. Talk with several MBZ mechanics to get further opinions.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for that opinion. It does seem that MB went through a spell of not being able to build a car with all the servo-gizmo that the Japanese are so good at.
I'm interested by your comments on Lexus. A friend of mine has a 91 Lexus SC300 which is a good looking car to my eye, and quite comfortable. People rave about them for reliability, but there sure are a lot of wires in there... SEO |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
I think if you visited a Lexus forum, you would see as many complaints as you do on this site...after all, people don't sit around posting about "how great my car runs" on a "Tech Help" forum...grass is always greener, I suppose.
I will contend that Lexus does bend over backwards as far as customer service is concerned, and they've got MB beat on that one!
__________________
2009 ML350 (106K) - Family vehicle 2001 CLK430 Cabriolet (80K) - Wife's car 2005 BMW 645CI (138K) - My daily driver 2016 Mustang (32K) - Daughter's car |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
My lifetime of car brand ownership:
Triumph TR 4 Volvo 122S Cadillac ambulance (tow vehicle) *Triumph TR4A Volvo 122s Ford 700 Cadillac hearse (tow vehicle) *Volvo 122s *Volvo 122s Dodge 100 Toyota Corolla Datsun diesel pickup Dodge 150 Ford 250 Mercedes 240 D *Mercedes 300d *Chev 2500HD *Mitsubishi Expo *Ford LN8000 (* means I still own the car, in some state of operability) Based on that list, I'd say the winner in the value-for-dollar contest is either the Mitsubishi or the Datsun. The Volvo was the most likeable and best to look at, and the 300 would be my choice to either drive across country or to hit a telephone pole with. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Last edited by deanyel; 05-04-2008 at 10:14 AM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
we purchased the 95 wagon about 1-1/2 years ago, wouldn't go back to the earlier M103 versions (unless there was a 5 spd involved). Its faster, more refined. etc. Based upon that we just got a 95 E320 sedan with 78K miles on it for my mom. Air is ice-cold, runs like a top. As soon as I do the engine wiring harness and tires all should be well with the world.
__________________
Hanno '79 6.9 Sold (after 27 years) '83 280SL, 5 spd. '94 E320 Sdn. 5 spd conversion '02 E320 Sdn.(on loan to mom!) '87 300E (5 spd. conversion) Sold '05 E500 Wagon |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Compare wagon and sedan
Does the 300TE wagon have the hydraulic rear suspension?
Anybody have an opinion about whether the wagon drives as well as the sedan? Does the wagon have more rear seat legroom? Can teenagers sit in the third row seat? Say for an hour? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Also,
there's a '93 E-series sedan with a 2.8 straight six in Ebay. Is this a smaller-displacement version of the 3.0. In the pictures it looks like a twincam. Any opinions on whether this is a good engine? And here's an idiotic question...Could the 5-speed Getrag from my 300d bolt to that 2.8? What was the manual transmission they used in the early E300's? http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=180237826771&_trksid=p2759.l1259#thumbsArea |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
1993 2.8 is a smaller version of the 3.2 HFM 104 motor, only one year in the E-class in the U.S. but several years in the C-class. It is generally a good motor but does have the same problems as the 3.2.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
I don't want to seem like a complete idiot, but what are the problems with the 3.2? I keep reading about timing chains, and I worry about variable valve timing. There's a lot to be said for a gear driven camshaft, even if it means push-rods.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
<
Is this a Tech question??? You want an answer from a Teenager, not a Tech Forum. As far as ASR goes...you live in Maine and being from the NE, I can tell you that you want a 4WD vehicle for winters b/c ASR does not cut it. ASR is simply a controlled traction device, in the sense that it is opposite an ABS systems..that's all.. if one wheel spins, the asr brakes that wheel and throttles the engine down...not a true TRACTION drive system
__________________
A Dalton |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|