I just mentioned that I was not a logic major to indicate that the structure / language of the argument is a bit of a stretch for my brain to wrap it's self around.

be that as it may, how does a person like me, who does not believe in a 'god' per-say, argue against that line of reasoning. My belief is that I am here as a matter of happenstance. Mom and dad got nasty (geez I hate that thought) and poof, here I am. The state, IMO has no interest in what my mom and dad did, much less if they decide to undo what they did.

I go through life on my own path as I believe everyone else does. I do not belive that our life has a purpose or an overseer. I am a molecule of water in a river finding the path of least resistance.

It seems to me that this is an argument that assumes some sort of belief structure to begin with. Since I do not believe in god, the idea of a ‘divine act’ is a bit alien to me.

__________________
Sent from an agnostic abacus

2014 C250 21,XXX my new DD ** 2013 GLK 350 18,000 Wife's new DD**

- With out god, life is everything.
- God is an ever receding pocket of scientific ignorance that's getting smaller and smaller as time moves on..." Neil DeGrasse Tyson
- You can pray for me, I'll think for you.
- When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.