Originally Posted by kerry edwards

Curious as to what people think of the following line of reasoning:

Existence is gratuitous. We had no right to demand to be brought into existence. God or nature or our mothers made a free choice to bring us into existence. Life is a gift. Neither God nor our mothers were obliged to create us. We are absolutely dependent on the will of our creator. Our creator is free to rescind that choice, otherwise, it wouldn't be a free, unobliged choice on their part. The only point at which our dependency on their will is transcended is when someone other than the creator can be the substitute for the will of the creator. Hence, abortion up to the point of viability outside the womb is a permissible act rooted in either divine freedom and/or the free choice of the mother.

Comments?