I believe we are comparing apples and oranges.

Clinton, as a candidate, is a far better tactician than just about any other candidate that comes to mind.

However, Rove, as the man behind the scenes, can, effectively, get a chimpanzee elected. His candidate has absolutely no stage presence, no compelling ideas and garners automatic support strictly from the religious right. It's up to Rove to fill in the gaps. I believe, with the limited capabilites of the candidate, that Rove is a more successful tactician than Clinton. But, I'd really need to see the two of them head to head for confirmation.

This was the previously referenced hypothetical election between GWB and Clinton. It would certainly be interesting......to say the least.