Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MattBelliveau
I was asking so that the answer might aid the research I've been doing on the effects of WVO on these engines. I'm asumming that DI sprays the pattern directly into the CC, correct? While IDI sprays the pattern into the prechamber, which relays it into the CC. If this is true, it would explain the claim of DI being more efficient, for there is one less variable involved. Thank you, guys.
|
due mostly to the fact that the combustion can expand directly onto the piston. with PC combustion must flow through the PC tube or whatever orifice it uses to pass into the CC.
I do like the piston burn protection and ... "quiet" combustion? anyway.
John