There is plenty to be suspicious about. I find it highly suspicious that soldiers involved in the incident gave false reports to their superiors (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,197755,00.html). And I agree with that American General (I forget his name) who said that it is amazing that there was no official investigation of the incident until after it was reported by Time magazine. But, to respond more directly to your question, no, Clarice Feldman's innuendo filled article really raises no suspicions in me, whatsoever.Zeitgeist can speak for himself, but how do you know that he assumed the worst? Because he is not impressed by Feldman's article? Even if her assumptions and innuendo point toward the truth, the facts admitted by the military so far are pretty awful.