Did we establish that I was the one missing anything? Wouldn't be the first time.She does it all the time, but I doubt that any of that was presented to the grand jury. Grand juries are one-sided deals. As far as I know, they only hear from the prosecutor.True.The problem with your analysis is that we don't know what evidence was presented to the grand jury. We know what the newspapers and talk shows said before the fact, but we don't know the specific testimony presented to the grand jury. Maybe the people who said incriminating things about McKinney were exaggerating in their statements to the press. Then, when they were put under oath and subject to being prosecuted for perjury, they told a different story.

It's all speculation.

For all the problems with our justice system, it gets things right more often than not. That's why we should respect the grand jury's decision. It's not as if we need an indictment to know what McKinney is. She proves it herself with her own preposterous statements. She must be bringing home the bacon down there in Atlanta because the voters keep electing her.That's why I say you are playing the race card. You don't know what evidence was presented to the grand jury, so you assume the decision was based on race. That's playing the race card.