The authorization itself is an issue, too. Several states' legislatures empowered the framers to sign the document with the stipulation that those states could withdraw if they so chose. None of those stipulations were debated in Convention, apparently.

If a contract is signed and the person signing it includes attachments modifying the original document, are they binding to all parties? If the signer believes that is the case (binding) but others do not (not binding), would that difference itself invalidate the contract?

Bot