Quote:
Originally Posted by soypwrd
Bush, cheney, rumsfeld, wolfowitz, perle, fief (sp), etc. ... you know, the ones who got us deep into in this no-win situation who are now claiming all is well and anyone who disagrees is a traitor. We are being governed by a ship of fools.
I too believe this is the best country in which to call home, just not what it used to be and certainly not what it could be. Who is to blame? Joe Sixpack for falling asleep at the wheel and turning over the reigns to bumbling idiots and self serving arrogant evil doers.
|
So just to clarify. You believe that the entire fault of what is happening in the world with regard to the middle east, North Korea, China, and so on is the complete fault and responsibility of the Bush Administration? Is this your position?
With regard to the no-win situation. It is far from that. As Rumsfeld pointed out and is plainly obvious, it may result in a no-win but not because we can't win but because we choose not to win. For a definitive no-win scenario I would invite you to review the foreign policy of the 1990s.
To my knowledge the term traitor has never been used by the current administration, myself or anyone I know. Even against those who are clearly traitors as are Lindh and Gadahn (actually, I've called them traitors as that's what they are). In large part the term as you apply it is of your own creation.