Quote:
Originally Posted by dculkin
I don't know what that sentence means.You didn't quote them at all, unless you are talking about some other post. I said:You paraphrased me as follows:Those two quotes speak for themselves. Was there some other post where you "quoted the entire sentence without editing"?It also quotes Bush using 9/11 as a justification for invading Iraq.I'm sure Saddam would have gladly nuked us. He just didn't have the capacity. I agreed with those who said before the invasion that he was not a threat. I was right. (Imagine that.)Geography is one of the main reasons the invasion was a bad idea. We removed Iran's natural enemy.I will have to go back and read the responses. I don't remember any that said that the US is responsible for all the events.Well, I apologize if I had a part in hijacking your thread.
One thing we could do to win the war on terror would be to focus our efforts on the people who threaten us, not on countries that don't threaten us.
|
So my asking you a question in my own words is incorrectly paraphrasing you???
You meant to imply, in fact you stated it, that Bush had linked Saddam's Iraq directly to the 9/11 attacks. He never did.
Clinton's administration felt the same way about many things regarding Al Qaida as you do about Iraq. Both of you are/were wrong.