Thread: '97 E300D vs '98 E300TD (and '99)
View Single Post
  #9  
Old 09-14-2006, 07:38 PM
nhdoc nhdoc is offline
Registered User
  
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Nashua, NH
Posts: 3,956
Well, since the N.A. engine from 1997 has 40 less HP (134@5000 RPM Vs 174@4400 RPM) and a lot less torque (the turbo has 244 ft-lbs and it develops it at 1600 RPM and the N.A. is 155 ft-lbs at 2600) I would guess that the N.A's times would be somewhere in the low to mid teens for 0-60...does anyone know MB's official 0-60 time for the '97 E300?
__________________
Marty D.

2013 C300 4Matic
1984 BMW 733i
2013 Lincoln MKz
Last edited by nhdoc; 09-14-2006 at 07:44 PM.
Reply With Quote