View Single Post
  #15  
Old 10-30-2006, 01:29 AM
cmac2012's Avatar
cmac2012 cmac2012 is online now
Me, Myself, and I
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 38,440
Quote:
Originally Posted by MS Fowler View Post
I think touch screens may be useful, but ONLY as am assisit to marking a paper ballot. We used to have paper ballots that required the voter simply to complete the arrow to vote for their candidates. That was simple enough. A computer could be used to mark those ballots if some wanted the assistance. In any event, after marking the ballot manually, or having the computer mark it, the voter than reviews the paper ballot to make sure it is marked as they intended. After that, an optical scanner counts the ballots. The paper ballots are stoered for a possible recount. Low tech and reliable. Why was that system ever changed?

I heard that Diebold says their machines have a "recount capability"---the machine uses its own memory to print out "paper ballots". But since they are simply another presentation of the same invisible electrons they are not traceable. The machine simply continues to report the same data.
What kills me, Diebold was complaining that having their machines print a paper receipt would be difficult, might make the machines jam, etc. This from a company that primarily, I believe, manufactures ATMs, which seem to have no trouble dispensing a paper receipt. I've never experienced one jamming -- being out of paper maybe, but that could be easily dealt with by polling place staff.
__________________
1986 300SDL, 362K
1984 300D, 138K
Reply With Quote