Thread: 2002 fuel economy - why is it different?
View Single Post
  #9  
Old 11-02-2001, 10:24 AM
Q Q is offline
Registered User
  
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 839
I would argue that 15/19 is a more acurate figure for the 2000 model. We get a little over 16 on average with it.
Reply With Quote