Quote:
Originally Posted by t walgamuth
amongst real scientists the debate is over.
we are definately causing global warming.
the only question is whether we can do anything about it quickly enough to avoid real catastrophy.
tom w
|
And who determines what a "real" scientist is? It is common sense when you see 2 sides to an argument (any argument) and one side is showing evidence of their claim (the non-Gores), while the other side doesn't, but rather tries to censor those in opposition. Doesn't take a genius.....
And the most telling fact is the warming alarmists who conveniently leave out temperature data from various periods in time because that data does not advance their theory (see little ice age). Plus in the 70's, all the news mags were talking of a nuclear winter and the coming ice age. Funny how people lose memory so fast.
Lets get even simpler: if mankind wanted to raise the temp a few degrees over the next few years, what we do to accomplish that? Answer: we don't know how to do it. So if we can't create it, we can't stop it. All those nuke tests over the years (US had >1000) didn't do anything. And if you do a little research, you will find that a single volcano spews more than all of mankind can.
Anybody that has any education in earth sciences laughs at the Gore-bots.
And lets say global warming is occurring. Guess what? When we go into ice ages, EVERYTHING dies. It is one big frozen desert. The warm periods are the times the earth flourishes. So that is one more point lost on the alarmists: does their prediction even euate to disaster? Not only can they not predict what is happening, they don't even understand the consequences of their prediction.
As one other poster stated, its all about the money.