Thread: Is Iran next?
View Single Post
  #13  
Old 03-24-2007, 11:41 AM
Emmerich's Avatar
Emmerich Emmerich is offline
M-100's in Dallas
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Dallas
Posts: 683
Quote:
Originally Posted by dculkin View Post
I don't know how W would understand anything about them when he refuses to even speak with them. I've seen evidence that they are willing to do business (so to speak), but we refuse to engage them in any discussions. Seems foolish to me.How do you know that they were legally in place? The Iranians say otherwise. This is from http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=070324132921.v0bpjlp8&show_article=1, I can't vouch for its accuracy:Which loonies? If you are talking about the American loonies, then I agree. If you are talking about the Iranian loonies, then I wonder how you reconcile your call for them to keep up the diplomatic pressure and your view that "They can't be reasoned with."
Lets see, a country bent on destroying Israel and all Jews everywhere can be reasoned with? Get a clue.

Bush did what his Dad *should* have done. Run Saddam out and plant a free foot in the region. If you Bush bashers could understand the big picture in even the slightest way, you wouldn't make so many dumb-ass comments.

This war is won, we cannot be defeated militarily. Only pathetic iditos bent on defeat (Dems, media) can reverse this fact. Iran and N Korea are next. This was just a warmup.

I could respect a true anti-war stance, even though it is an unrealistic way to live your life, it always assumes the other guy is rational and doesn't want you dead. But nothing you hear today is true anti-war, its just anti-Bush, and in case nobody noticed, thats not an idealogy, is a sickness.
__________________
MB-less
Reply With Quote