Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatterasguy
No its the C, from that angle it looks like the W221. But in person it looks a little like a W211, but not a direct copy.
Its a big car, weighs as much as my SDL, and probably has similer interior room to the SD.
|
Get your car weighed on a properly calibrated scale, it should be, without any luggage or passengers but nearly a full tank of fuel and all fluids, approximately 4000 lbs. The real curb weight of an E320 Bluetec is about 3700 lbs without the 68 kg (150 lbs) driver and 7 kg luggage included in current directive 92/21/EC, version 95/48/EC. The old diesel S is ~ 2 - 300 lbs heavier.
The W221, W126, W140, and W220 have very similar real world interior dimensions if you've measured them out individually. How can a C-Class have as much interior volume as an S-Class? I admit I haven't been in the W204 to compare, but that's quite a tall glass to fill. Now the W210 had as much rear seat legroom as a W140 SWB sedan, this much I know. But a C-Class?
The W204 is generally accepted by the elderly crowd as a very ugly and unappealing car. The younger generation seems to love the angular look. I personally hate the fact that MB is not evolving from its earlier designs, as it has done for the past 50 years, and scrapping tradition for "bling-bling" looks (the sport edition with its centered grill star comes to mind).
It stings my eyes, take it away.