View Single Post
  #19  
Old 04-15-2007, 09:17 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Hatterasguy Hatterasguy is offline
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,323
Quote:
Originally Posted by DslBnz View Post
Get your car weighed on a properly calibrated scale, it should be, without any luggage or passengers but nearly a full tank of fuel and all fluids, approximately 4000 lbs. The real curb weight of an E320 Bluetec is about 3700 lbs without the 68 kg (150 lbs) driver and 7 kg luggage included in current directive 92/21/EC, version 95/48/EC. The old diesel S is ~ 2 - 300 lbs heavier.

The W221, W126, W140, and W220 have very similar real world interior dimensions if you've measured them out individually. How can a C-Class have as much interior volume as an S-Class? I admit I haven't been in the W204 to compare, but that's quite a tall glass to fill. Now the W210 had as much rear seat legroom as a W140 SWB sedan, this much I know. But a C-Class?

The W204 is generally accepted by the elderly crowd as a very ugly and unappealing car. The younger generation seems to love the angular look. I personally hate the fact that MB is not evolving from its earlier designs, as it has done for the past 50 years, and scrapping tradition for "bling-bling" looks (the sport edition with its centered grill star comes to mind).

It stings my eyes, take it away.
According to the door jam the SDL is about 3,800 pounds and some change. I never compared the interior volumes just going by what it looked like, since they wouldn't let you sit in one. But it's a big car, looks to be larger then the W203.


The world march's on MB can't make a W108 anymore. Their new line up is very impressive. Bash the new ones all you want, but they are fine cars. What am I suposed to do drive W126's for the next 10 years? Yeah right I'm tired of fixing old cars; besides the old ones are no bargin anyway, they have their fair share of issues.
__________________
2006 CL500
2009 C300 4matic
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote