View Single Post
  #26  
Old 06-11-2007, 09:58 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Botnst Botnst is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,587
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerry edwards View Post
1. Finally printed it out and am reading it more closely. There seems to me something she is not examing: It may not be that smaller families cause a decling in religion but that whatever causes smaller families also causes decline in religion.

2. From what I've observed in religious people, such people are much less inclined to 'play God' (whatever that means). This means they are less likely to take deliberate effort to direct their lives and limit the number of children. Non-religious people are more Promethean and willing to take deliberate action to create their lives. So, what may be happening is that a certain kind of personality is evolving in the modern world (the Promethean person or in economic terms, the capitalist rational man, or the Nietzschean proto-Supermen) which in the short term to individuals means they plan their families, and in the long term, find religion less relevant to their lives.
1. Excellent example of the fundamental problem of inferring causality from correlation. A corollary is that the more factors one includes in a correlation analysis, the greater the correlation. This seems to imply increasing causation, but it does not.

2. Reasonable derivative of #1. I especially like the fatalistic vs Promethean contrast. Succinct and very rich. Probably the main reason I have low tolerance for predestination.
Reply With Quote