Quote:
Originally Posted by peragro
Oh, that. Is this the quote you're looking for:
"The reports that you provide to us really require the willing suspension of disbelief,"
Do you think that the reports in question would contain truth if one suspended disbelief?
Calling someone a liar nicely is still calling someone a liar.
|
That's the spin you wish to jump to. I've said it before, see if you can get your mind around this one:
A person could be utterly convinced they were telling the truth even though they were speaking delusional nonsense. Truth is relative. You and Botnst believe (I think I have this right) that the war in Vietnam could have been won if we hadn't stopped funding the South in what, '74 or '75? Or could have been won if not for the cowardly left at home.
I don't call you liars for saying this but I'd have to suspend disbelief to accept it as fact.