Quote:
Originally Posted by cmac2012
Well, that was a bit rude, even by my standards. Let's review:
You really couldn't make sense of this? I'mo s'plain it to you.
Much gnashing of teeth about NPR et.al. unfairly competeing with private broadcasters. Private broadcasters nonetheless making Major profits with General business. Could be the competition from CPB etc. (Corporation for Public Broadcasting) has forced private media to improve.
Good thing, because in the 50s and early 60s, there was nothing on the publicly owned airwaves that remotely resembled educational programming.
Instead we had psuedo doctors talking about the benefits of smoking.
I've made plenty of good points here for which you have no good answer. Instead you traffic in nonsense. Step up to the plate, slugger.
|
The only one I've heard gnashing teeth about private competitors to NPR is you, on another thread.
I don't think Limbaugh is competition for CPB, the closest comparison would be Bill Moyers who is as partisan as is Limbaugh - he is publicly funded.
BTW, nobody on the other thread said they disliked CPB they just said they questioned government funding of it. No one here or on any other thread or in any other venue that I'm aware of has ever suggested Limbaugh be publicly funded.
I do have problems following your train of thought at times. All I have to go on is what you write. My tinfoil cap clouds my psychic ability to a great extent. Perhaps you could just make it simple and present one thesis at a time and on the pertinent thread? Oh, and as the ***** slapee, I think that cuts me some slack in how I reply; maybe you could adjust your standards accordingly?