Quote:
Originally Posted by davidmash
I went into CostCo the other day and up front they had all the LCD/Plasmas lined up. I was not looking at the signs to see what was what on purpose and when I looked at them I noticed that some were brighter ten others. Each one that I thought was brighter and had a better picture was a Plasma. The LCD's did not look bad my any means but the Plasmas seemed to have a more appealing and eye catching picture.
When I get in the market, I think I'll be going for Plasma unless something changes in the next nano-second.
|
1) You cannot tell anything from looking in the store since none of the sets are adjusted correctly. They just set them on "neon" to catch your attention.
2) Everyone in the world seems to agree that in general LCDs are "brighter" than plasma, although some are not as bright such as Sharp. The main knocks on LCDs are: motion blur (I never saw any on my Sony rated at 8mS), contrast ratio/black level (this is something that some people believe they can see, like some people think vinyl records sound better, I always thought my set had good black levels).
Mike
__________________
1998 C230 330,000 miles (currently dead of second failed EIS, yours will fail too, turning you into the dealer's personal human cash machine)
1988 F150 144,000 miles (leaks all the colors of the rainbow)
Previous stars: 1981 Brava 210,000 miles, 1978 128 150,000 miles, 1977 B200 Van 175,000 miles, 1972 Vega (great, if rusty, car), 1972 Celica, 1986.5 Supra
|