Quote:
Originally Posted by tankdriver
The fact that a *****storm over an ancillary piece of evidence that was true in substance got him ousted
|
Gosh, you and Cmac both seem very good at taking proven forgeries and obvious propaganda and using words like "true in substance" and "was it far away from the truth" to describe them. I guess anything goes to support your POV.
Easy arguing with that kind of logic. Especially if your a super-duper secret agent guy that was really around to hear what was actually said - like me and Bot too, I guess, even though I didn't actually see him. Well, not really, but it's true in substance and not really to far away from the truth.