Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst
Do weepy confession appear more factual than non-weepy reminiscences?
When distinguishing the two, evidence is really useful. Without actual evidence, all we have are a buncha opinions masquerading as fact. Under the right circumstances we may call that lying or slander or libel or factual. How do we determine which is which?
B
|
You certainly have no problem with the unsubstantiated claims of WMD made by Bush. Or is he a liar also?